Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Dec;38(6 Pt 1):1625-40.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2003.00196.x.

Sampling patients within physician practices and health plans: multistage cluster samples in health services research

John L Adams  1 , Steven L Wickstrom, Margaret J Burgess, Paul P Lee, José J Escarce
Affiliations

Sampling patients within physician practices and health plans: multistage cluster samples in health services research

John L Adams et al. Health Serv Res. 2003 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To better inform study design decisions when sampling patients within health plans and physician practices with multiple analysis goals.

Study setting: Chronic eye care patients within six health plans across the United States.

Study design: We developed a simulation-based approach for designing multistage samples. We created a range of candidate designs, evaluated them with respect to multiple sampling goals, investigated their tradeoffs, and identified the design that is the best compromise among all goals. This approach recognizes that most data collection efforts have multiple competing goals.

Data collection: We constructed a sample frame from all diabetic patients in six health plans with evidence of chronic eye disease (glaucoma and retinopathy).

Principal findings: Simulations of different study designs can uncover efficiency gains as well as inform potential tradeoffs among study goals. Simulations enable us to quantify these efficiency gains and to draw tradeoff curves.

Conclusions: When designing a complex multistage sample it is desirable to explore the tradeoffs between competing sampling goals via simulation. Simulations enable us to investigate a larger number of candidate designs and are therefore likely to identify more efficient designs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The Production Possibility Frontier for the Tradeoff Between Proliferative, Glaucoma, and Background Cases
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Biemer P. “Optimal Dual Frame Sample Design: Results of a Simulation Study.”. Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section of the American Statistical Association. 1983:630–5.
    1. Chromy JR. “Design Optimization with Multiple Objectives.”. Proceedings on the Research Methods of the American Statistical Association. 1987:194–9.
    1. Cochran WG. Sampling Techniques. 3d ed. New York: Wiley; 1977.
    1. Folson RE, Potter FJ, Williams SR. “Notes on a Composite Size Measure for Self-Weighting Samples in Multiple Domains.”. Proceedings on the Research Methods of the American Statistical Association. 1987:792–6.
    1. Gabler S, Haeder S, Lahiri P. “A Model Based Justification of Kish's Formula for Design Effects for Weighting and Clustering.”. Survey Methodology. 1999;25(1):105–6.