Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening
- PMID: 15027866
- DOI: 10.1021/jm030644s
Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening
Abstract
Glide's ability to identify active compounds in a database screen is characterized by applying Glide to a diverse set of nine protein receptors. In many cases, two, or even three, protein sites are employed to probe the sensitivity of the results to the site geometry. To make the database screens as realistic as possible, the screens use sets of "druglike" decoy ligands that have been selected to be representative of what we believe is likely to be found in the compound collection of a pharmaceutical or biotechnology company. Results are presented for releases 1.8, 2.0, and 2.5 of Glide. The comparisons show that average measures for both "early" and "global" enrichment for Glide 2.5 are 3 times higher than for Glide 1.8 and more than 2 times higher than for Glide 2.0 because of better results for the least well-handled screens. This improvement in enrichment stems largely from the better balance of the more widely parametrized GlideScore 2.5 function and the inclusion of terms that penalize ligand-protein interactions that violate established principles of physical chemistry, particularly as it concerns the exposure to solvent of charged protein and ligand groups. Comparisons to results for the thymidine kinase and estrogen receptors published by Rognan and co-workers (J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 4759-4767) show that Glide 2.5 performs better than GOLD 1.1, FlexX 1.8, or DOCK 4.01.
Similar articles
-
A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance.Proteins. 2004 Aug 1;56(2):235-49. doi: 10.1002/prot.20088. Proteins. 2004. PMID: 15211508
-
Extra precision glide: docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes.J Med Chem. 2006 Oct 19;49(21):6177-96. doi: 10.1021/jm051256o. J Med Chem. 2006. PMID: 17034125
-
Lead finder: an approach to improve accuracy of protein-ligand docking, binding energy estimation, and virtual screening.J Chem Inf Model. 2008 Dec;48(12):2371-85. doi: 10.1021/ci800166p. J Chem Inf Model. 2008. PMID: 19007114
-
Importance of molecular computer modeling in anticancer drug development.J BUON. 2007 Sep;12 Suppl 1:S101-18. J BUON. 2007. PMID: 17935268 Review.
-
Virtual high-throughput screening of molecular databases.Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel. 2007 May;10(3):298-307. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel. 2007. PMID: 17554856 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of potential anti-RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP) drugs against the newly emerged model of COVID-19 RdRP using computational methods.Biophys Chem. 2021 May;272:106564. doi: 10.1016/j.bpc.2021.106564. Epub 2021 Feb 20. Biophys Chem. 2021. PMID: 33711743 Free PMC article.
-
New classes of potent heparanase inhibitors from ligand-based virtual screening.J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2020 Dec;35(1):1685-1696. doi: 10.1080/14756366.2020.1811701. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2020. PMID: 32907434 Free PMC article.
-
Retrieval Augmented Docking Using Hierarchical Navigable Small Worlds.J Chem Inf Model. 2024 Oct 14;64(19):7398-7408. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.4c00683. Epub 2024 Oct 3. J Chem Inf Model. 2024. PMID: 39360680 Free PMC article.
-
Identification of Docetaxel as a Potential Drug to Promote HDL Biogenesis.Front Pharmacol. 2021 May 21;12:679456. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.679456. eCollection 2021. Front Pharmacol. 2021. PMID: 34093205 Free PMC article.
-
In silico Druggability Assessment of the NUDIX Hydrolase Protein Family as a Workflow for Target Prioritization.Front Chem. 2020 May 29;8:443. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00443. eCollection 2020. Front Chem. 2020. PMID: 32548091 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources

