Breast cancer and abortion: collaborative reanalysis of data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 83?000 women with breast cancer from 16 countries
- PMID: 15051280
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15835-2
Breast cancer and abortion: collaborative reanalysis of data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 83?000 women with breast cancer from 16 countries
Abstract
Background: The Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer has brought together the worldwide epidemiological evidence on the possible relation between breast cancer and previous spontaneous and induced abortions.
Methods: Data on individual women from 53 studies undertaken in 16 countries with liberal abortion laws were checked and analysed centrally. Relative risks of breast cancer--comparing the effects of having had a pregnancy that ended as an abortion with those of never having had that pregnancy--were calculated, stratified by study, age at diagnosis, parity, and age at first birth. Because the extent of under-reporting of past induced abortions might be influenced by whether or not women had been diagnosed with breast cancer, results of the studies--including a total of 44000 women with breast cancer--that used prospective information on abortion (ie, information that had been recorded before the diagnosis of breast cancer) were considered separately from results of the studies--including 39000 women with the disease--that used retrospective information (recorded after the diagnosis of breast cancer).
Findings: The overall relative risk of breast cancer, comparing women with a prospective record of having had one or more pregnancies that ended as a spontaneous abortion versus women with no such record, was 0.98 (95% CI 0.92-1.04, p=0.5). The corresponding relative risk for induced abortion was 0.93 (0.89-0.96, p=0.0002). Among women with a prospective record of having had a spontaneous or an induced abortion, the risk of breast cancer did not differ significantly according to the number or timing of either type of abortion. Published results on induced abortion from the few studies with prospectively recorded information that were not available for inclusion here are consistent with these findings. Overall results for induced abortion differed substantially between studies with prospective and those with retrospective information on abortion (test for heterogeneity between relative risks: chi2(1) =33.1, p<0.0001).
Interpretation: Pregnancies that end as a spontaneous or induced abortion do not increase a woman's risk of developing breast cancer. Collectively, the studies of breast cancer with retrospective recording of induced abortion yielded misleading results, possibly because women who had developed breast cancer were, on average, more likely than other women to disclose previous induced abortions.
Comment in
-
Abortion and breast cancer.Lancet. 2004 Jun 5;363(9424):1910-1. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16375-7. Lancet. 2004. PMID: 15183642 No abstract available.
-
Review: spontaneous or induced abortion is not associated with development of breast cancer.Evid Based Nurs. 2004 Oct;7(4):122. doi: 10.1136/ebn.7.4.122. Evid Based Nurs. 2004. PMID: 15487100 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Induced and spontaneous abortion and incidence of breast cancer among young women: a prospective cohort study.Arch Intern Med. 2007 Apr 23;167(8):814-20. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.8.814. Arch Intern Med. 2007. PMID: 17452545
-
Breast cancer in relation to the occurrence and time of induced and spontaneous abortion.Am J Epidemiol. 1988 May;127(5):981-9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114901. Am J Epidemiol. 1988. PMID: 2578017
-
Induced and spontaneous abortion and breast cancer risk: results from the E3N cohort study.Int J Cancer. 2003 Aug 20;106(2):270-6. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11203. Int J Cancer. 2003. PMID: 12800205
-
The risk of breast cancer following spontaneous or induced abortion.Cancer Causes Control. 1997 Jan;8(1):93-108. doi: 10.1023/a:1018443507512. Cancer Causes Control. 1997. PMID: 9051328 Review.
-
No association between abortion and risk of breast cancer among nulliparous women: Evidence from a meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May;99(19):e20251. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020251. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 32384520 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by 41 articles
-
Menstrual and Reproductive Factors and Risk of Breast Cancer in Iranian Female Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Int J Prev Med. 2022 Feb 23;13:26. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_646_20. eCollection 2022. Int J Prev Med. 2022. PMID: 35392324 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Geospatiotemporal and causal inference study of cannabis and other drugs as risk factors for female breast cancer USA 2003-2017.Environ Epigenet. 2022 Mar 1;8(1):dvac006. doi: 10.1093/eep/dvac006. eCollection 2022. Environ Epigenet. 2022. PMID: 35386387 Free PMC article.
-
Reproductive Pattern of Parous Women and the Risk of Cancer in Later Life.Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jul 24;13(15):3731. doi: 10.3390/cancers13153731. Cancers (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34359630 Free PMC article.
-
Cancer Progress and Priorities: Breast Cancer.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021 May;30(5):822-844. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1193. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021. PMID: 33947744 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Distribution of Breast Cancer Subtypes Among Nigerian Women and Correlation to the Risk Factors and Clinicopathological Characteristics.World J Oncol. 2020 Aug;11(4):165-172. doi: 10.14740/wjon1303. Epub 2020 Aug 10. World J Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32849957 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
