Comparison of one-step RT-PCR and a nested PCR for the detection of canine distemper virus in clinical samples

Aust Vet J. 2004 Jan-Feb;82(1-2):83-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2004.tb14651.x.

Abstract

Objective: To develop a rapid and sensitive method for the detection of canine distemper virus (CDV) by nested PCR using clinical specimens.

Design: A nested PCR was developed, compared to a one-step RT-PCR and validated.

Procedure: Two sets of specific primers for a one-step RT-PCR and a nested PCR, targeting a 640 bp fragment and a 297 bp fragment, respectively, were selected from the highly conserved region of the nucleocapsid protein (NP) gene of CDV. The nested PCR and the one-step RT-PCR were used to amplify a part of the CDV NP gene of a CDV vaccinal strain and samples of urine, blood, nasal discharge and saliva from 29 dogs suspected of suffering CD.

Results: Both the one-step RT-PCR and the nested PCR reacted with the CDV vaccinal strain, but not with canine parvovirus. The expected 640 bp fragment of the NP gene was detected in 11/22 (50.0%) blood, 10/20 (50.0%) urine, 5/25 (20.0%) saliva and 6/27 (22.2%) nasal swab samples by one-step RT-PCR, whereas the nested PCR amplified an expected 297 bp fragment of the NP gene in 18/22 (81.8%) blood, 15/20 (75.0%) urine, 14/25 (56%) saliva and 19/27 (70.3%) nasal swab samples.

Conclusion: The nested PCR detected CDV in blood, urine, nasal swab and saliva more frequently than did the one-step RT-PCR. Therefore, this assay should be a useful aid to antemortem diagnosis of CDV infections in dogs.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • DNA Primers
  • Distemper / diagnosis*
  • Distemper Virus, Canine / genetics
  • Distemper Virus, Canine / isolation & purification*
  • Dogs
  • Female
  • Male
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction / veterinary*
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction / veterinary

Substances

  • DNA Primers