Comparison of first-line antiretroviral therapy with regimens including nevirapine, efavirenz, or both drugs, plus stavudine and lamivudine: a randomised open-label trial, the 2NN Study
- PMID: 15094269
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15997-7
Comparison of first-line antiretroviral therapy with regimens including nevirapine, efavirenz, or both drugs, plus stavudine and lamivudine: a randomised open-label trial, the 2NN Study
Abstract
Background: The 2NN Study was a randomised comparison of the non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) nevirapine and efavirenz.
Methods: In this multicentre, open-label, randomised trial, 1216 antiretroviral-therapy-naive patients were assigned nevirapine 400 mg once daily, nevirapine 200 mg twice daily, efavirenz 600 mg once daily, or nevirapine (400 mg) and efavirenz (800 mg) once daily, plus stavudine and lamivudine, for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with treatment failure (less than 1 log(10) decline in plasma HIV-1 RNA in the first 12 weeks or two consecutive measurements of more than 50 copies per mL from week 24 onwards, disease progression [new Centers for Disease Control and Prevention grade C event or death], or change of allocated treatment). Analyses were by intention to treat.
Findings: Treatment failure occurred in 96 (43.6%) of 220 patients assigned nevirapine once daily, 169 (43.7%) of 387 assigned nevirapine twice daily, 151 (37.8%) of 400 assigned efavirenz, and 111 (53.1%) of 209 assigned nevirapine plus efavirenz. The difference between nevirapine twice daily and efavirenz was 5.9% (95% CI -0.9 to 12.8). There were no significant differences among the study groups in the proportions with plasma HIV-1 RNA concentrations below 50 copies per mL at week 48 (p=0.193) or the increases in CD4-positive cells (p=0.800). Nevirapine plus efavirenz was associated with the highest frequency of clinical adverse events, and nevirapine once daily with significantly more hepatobiliary laboratory toxicities than efavirenz. Of 25 observed deaths, two were attributed to nevirapine.
Interpretation: Antiretroviral therapy with nevirapine or efavirenz showed similar efficacy, so triple-drug regimens with either NNRTI are valid for first-line treatment. There are, however, differences in safety profiles. Combination of nevirapine and efavirenz did not improve efficacy but caused more adverse events.
Comment in
-
Antiretroviral therapy for previously untreated HIV-1-infected adults: 2NN, or just one?Lancet. 2004 Apr 17;363(9417):1248-50. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16028-5. Lancet. 2004. PMID: 15094265 No abstract available.
-
First-line and second-line antiretroviral therapy.Lancet. 2004 Jul 24-30;364(9431):329; author reply 330. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16716-0. Lancet. 2004. PMID: 15276388 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Nevirapine versus efavirenz for patients co-infected with HIV and tuberculosis: a randomised non-inferiority trial.Lancet Infect Dis. 2013 Apr;13(4):303-12. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70007-0. Epub 2013 Feb 20. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013. PMID: 23433590 Clinical Trial.
-
Nevirapine plus efavirenz plus didanosine: a simple, safe, and effective once-daily regimen for patients with HIV infection.J Natl Med Assoc. 2003 Dec;95(12):1152-7. J Natl Med Assoc. 2003. PMID: 14717471 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and safety of efavirenz 400 mg daily versus 600 mg daily: 96-week data from the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority ENCORE1 study.Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Jul;15(7):793-802. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)70060-5. Epub 2015 Apr 12. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015. PMID: 25877963 Clinical Trial.
-
Stavudine, lamivudine and nevirapine combination therapy for treatment of HIV infection and AIDS in adults.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19;2006(2):CD004535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004535.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006. PMID: 16625606 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[The use of the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors nevirapine and efavirenz in the treatment of patients with a chronic HIV-I infection].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2006 Aug 5;150(31):1719-22. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2006. PMID: 16924943 Review. Dutch.
Cited by
-
Prevalence of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease in people living with HIV and on antiretroviral treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.Health Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 28;7(11):e70071. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70071. eCollection 2024 Nov. Health Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39474343 Free PMC article.
-
Liver Damage During Treatment with Reverse-Transcriptase Inhibitors in HIV Patients.Curr Health Sci J. 2024 Apr-Jun;50(2):181-197. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.50.02.03. Epub 2024 Jun 30. Curr Health Sci J. 2024. PMID: 39371070 Free PMC article. Review.
-
ABCG2 polymorphisms and susceptibility to ARV-associated hepatotoxicity.Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2024 Mar;12(3):e2362. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.2362. Epub 2024 Mar 7. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2024. PMID: 38451012 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of hepatotoxicity among HIV-infected patients in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Nov 9;22(1):826. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07838-w. BMC Infect Dis. 2022. PMID: 36352398 Free PMC article.
-
Two-Drug Regimens for HIV-Current Evidence, Research Gaps and Future Challenges.Microorganisms. 2022 Feb 14;10(2):433. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10020433. Microorganisms. 2022. PMID: 35208887 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
