Retraction policies of high-impact biomedical journals

J Med Libr Assoc. 2004 Apr;92(2):242-50.


Purpose: The purpose is to review the issue of retraction in the scientific literature and to examine the policies on retraction of major biomedical journals.

Method: The historical background of this issue was investigated through a literature search. The Instructions to Authors of 122 major biomedical journals were reviewed for evidence of a policy on the retraction of articles. Editors of those journals with no mention of retraction in their Instructions to Authors were contacted by email and/or postal mail.

Results: Sixty-two percent of the journals investigated did not post or report having a policy on issuing retractions. Only twenty-one (18%) did. The remainder did not post any policy and did not respond to inquiries.

Discussion: Including policies in Instructions to Authors relating to the principled conduct of research and publication will improve the ethical environment in which the scientific community works.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Authorship*
  • Biomedical Research
  • Clinical Competence
  • Humans
  • Journalism, Medical / standards*
  • Periodicals as Topic / standards*
  • Professional Role
  • Retraction of Publication as Topic*
  • United States