Background: Gene transfer offers considerable potential for altering vessel wall physiology and intervention in vascular disease. Therefore, there is great interest in developing optimal strategies and vectors for efficient, targeted gene delivery into a vessel wall.
Methods: We studied adeno-associated viruses (AAV; 9 x 10(8) to 4 x 10(9) TU/ml) for their usefulness to transduce rabbit arteries in vivo in comparison with adenoviruses (Adv; 1 x 10(9) to 1 x 10(10) pfu/ml). 100 microl of viruses or placebo solution were injected intraluminally into transiently isolated carotid segments.
Results: In normal arteries AAV transduced mainly medial smooth muscle cells (SMC) while Adv transduced exclusively endothelial cells (EC). Mechanical injury to EC layer and internal elastic lamina enabled Adv to penetrate and transduce medial SMC. Transgene expression in EC after the AAV-mediated gene transfer was very low. The use of the EC-specific Tie-1 promoter did not lead to specific transgene expression in EC. Transgene expression in SMC persisted for at least 100 days after the AAV treatment whereas the Adv-mediated effect diminished in 14 days. AAV caused only a modest increase in EC VCAM-1 expression and proliferation rate of vascular cells as compared with the mock-treated arteries while Adv caused an extensive inflammatory cell infiltration, VCAM-1 expression, vascular cell proliferation and morphological damages.
Conclusions: Significant differences were observed between the AAV and the Adv vectors in their patterns of arterial transduction and consequent inflammatory responses. These distinct properties may be utilized for different applications in vascular biology research and gene therapy for cardiovascular diseases.
Copyright 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.