Nosocomial sinusitis in ventilated patients. Nasotracheal versus orotracheal intubation

Anaesthesia. 1992 Apr;47(4):335-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1992.tb02177.x.

Abstract

A total of 68 postoperative patients whose lungs were ventilated for more than 4 days were studied prospectively during a one-year study period to investigate the effect of the mode of intubation on the paranasal sinuses. After an initial X ray of the skull showing no pathological findings, patients were assigned randomly to one of the study groups; the lungs of patients in group A were ventilated via an orotracheal tube (n = 32), and patients in group B via a nasotracheal tube (n = 36). X ray examinations of the sinuses were performed at regular intervals. Diagnosis of sinusitis was confirmed by transantral needle puncture and culture of fluids obtained. Antibiotic regimens were altered according to laboratory testing. Two patients in group A developed signs of sinusitis in comparison to 15 patients in group B (p less than 0.01). However, there were significantly more airway complications in the orotracheal group, particularly during the period of weaning from ventilation. We conclude that orotracheal intubation should be preferred as the routine route of intubation.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Cross Infection / etiology*
  • Cross Infection / microbiology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Intensive Care Units
  • Intubation, Gastrointestinal / adverse effects*
  • Intubation, Intratracheal / adverse effects*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Postoperative Period
  • Respiration, Artificial
  • Sinusitis / etiology*
  • Sinusitis / microbiology