Aerosol penetration through surgical masks
- PMID: 1524265
- DOI: 10.1016/s0196-6553(05)80143-9
Aerosol penetration through surgical masks
Abstract
Background: Surgical masks are used in hospitals to reduce postoperative infection in patients. The presence of aerosols containing pathogens makes it desirable to protect the medical staff as well.
Methods: The collection efficiencies of surgical masks measured with two aerosol-size spectrometers. The flow rates through the masks were varied from 5 to 100 L/min to study the flow dependency. For comparison, several industrial-type respirators were also tested.
Results: A surgical mask consisting of filter material performed better than did a surgical mask consisting only of a shell with a coarse pore structure. The latter passed 80% of submicrometer-sized aerosols with little flow dependency, whereas the penetration of submicrometer-sized aerosols through the mask made of filter material ranged from 25% at a flow rate of 5 L/min to 70% at 100 L/min.
Conclusions: The mask that has the highest collection efficiency is not necessarily the best mask from the perspective of the filter-quality factor, which considers not only the capture efficiency but also the air resistance. Although surgical mask media may be adequate to remove bacteria exhaled or expelled by health care workers, they may not be sufficient to remove the submicrometer-size aerosols containing pathogens to which these health care workers are potentially exposed.
Similar articles
-
Aerosol penetration and leakage characteristics of masks used in the health care industry.Am J Infect Control. 1993 Aug;21(4):167-73. doi: 10.1016/0196-6553(93)90027-2. Am J Infect Control. 1993. PMID: 8239046
-
Evaluation of single-use masks and respirators for protection of health care workers against mycobacterial aerosols.Am J Infect Control. 1994 Apr;22(2):65-74. doi: 10.1016/0196-6553(94)90116-3. Am J Infect Control. 1994. PMID: 8060007
-
Do N95 respirators provide 95% protection level against airborne viruses, and how adequate are surgical masks?Am J Infect Control. 2006 Mar;34(2):51-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2005.08.018. Am J Infect Control. 2006. PMID: 16490606
-
Disposable surgical face masks: a systematic review.Can Oper Room Nurs J. 2005 Sep;23(3):20-1, 24-5, 33-8. Can Oper Room Nurs J. 2005. PMID: 16295987 Review.
-
Performance of dust respirators with facial seal leaks: II. Predictive model.Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1987 Oct;48(10):842-7. doi: 10.1080/15298668791385688. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1987. PMID: 3318364 Review.
Cited by
-
Personal protective equipment in the siege of respiratory viral pandemics: strides made and next steps.Expert Rev Respir Med. 2021 Apr;15(4):441-452. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2021.1865812. Epub 2020 Dec 24. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2021. PMID: 33322947 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Face masks against COVID-19: Standards, efficacy, testing and decontamination methods.Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2021 Jun;292:102435. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2021.102435. Epub 2021 Apr 29. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2021. PMID: 33971389 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Hybrid Reactive Multiphasic Mixture With a Compressible Fluid Solvent.J Biomech Eng. 2022 Jan 1;144(1):011013. doi: 10.1115/1.4051926. J Biomech Eng. 2022. PMID: 34318318 Free PMC article.
-
Nanoparticle Filtration Performance of Commercially Available Dust Masks.J Int Soc Respir Prot. 2008 Spring-Summer;25(3):27-41. J Int Soc Respir Prot. 2008. PMID: 32661452 Free PMC article.
-
Face masks effectively limit the probability of SARS-CoV-2 transmission.Science. 2021 May 20;372(6549):1439-43. doi: 10.1126/science.abg6296. Online ahead of print. Science. 2021. PMID: 34016743 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
