Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2004 Jul-Aug;11(4):459-63.
doi: 10.1101/lm.81004.

Contributions of striatal subregions to place and response learning

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Contributions of striatal subregions to place and response learning

Henry H Yin et al. Learn Mem. 2004 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

The involvement of different subregions of the striatum in place and response learning was examined using a T-maze. Rats were given NMDA lesions of the dorsolateral striatum (DLS), anterior dorsomedial striatum (ADMS), posterior dorsomedial striatum (PDMS), or sham surgery. They were then trained to retrieve food from the west arm of the maze, starting from the south arm, by turning left at the choice point. After 7 d of training, with four trials a day, a probe test was given in which the starting arm is inserted as the north arm, at the opposite side of the maze. A left turn would indicate a "response" strategy; a right turn, a "place" strategy. The rats were then trained for 7 more days, followed by a second probe test. Unlike rats in the other groups, most of the rats in the PDMS group turned left, using the response strategy on both probe tests. These results suggest that the PDMS plays a role in spatially guided behavior.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The extent of damage caused by NMDA lesions. SHAM, sham operated controls; ADMS, anterior dorsomedial striatum; PDMS, posterior dorsomedial striatum; DLS, dorsolateral striatum. From top to bottom the distances from bregma in mm are: DLS and ADMS, 1.6, 1, 0.48, -0.26; PDMS, 0.2, -0.26, -0.3, -0.8.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Performance across 14 d of acquisition training. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The results from both probe tests. Abbreviations as in Figure 1. The numbers in the parentheses show how many rats from each lesion group made that particular choice (place or response).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adams, S., Kesner, R.P., and Ragozzino, M.E. 2001. Role of the medial and lateral caudate-putamen in mediating an auditory conditional response association. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 76: 106-116. - PubMed
    1. Alexander, G.E. and Crutcher, M.D. 1990. Functional architecture of basal ganglia circuits: Neural substrates of parallel processing. Trends Neurosci. 13: 266-271. - PubMed
    1. Alexander, G.E., DeLong, M.R., and Strick, P.L. 1986. Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 9: 357-381. - PubMed
    1. Berendse, H.W., Galis-de Graaf, Y., and Groenewegen, H.J. 1992. Topographical organization and relationship with ventral striatal compartments of prefrontal corticostriatal projections in the rat. J. Comp. Neurol. 316: 314-347. - PubMed
    1. Corbit, L.H. and Balleine, B.W. 2003. The role of prelimbic cortex in instrumental conditioning. Behav. Brain Res. 146: 145-157. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources