Influence of personal characteristics of individual women on sensitivity and specificity of mammography in the Million Women Study: cohort study
- PMID: 15331472
- PMCID: PMC515195
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.329.7464.477
Influence of personal characteristics of individual women on sensitivity and specificity of mammography in the Million Women Study: cohort study
Abstract
Objectives: To examine how lifestyle, hormonal, and other factors influence the sensitivity and specificity of mammography.
Methods: Women recruited into the Million Women Study completed a questionnaire about various personal factors before routine mammographic screening. A sample of 122,355 women aged 50-64 years were followed for outcome of screening and incident breast cancer in the next 12 months. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated by using standard definitions, with adjustment for potential confounding factors.
Results: Breast cancer was diagnosed in 726 (0.6%) women, 629 in screen positive and 97 in screen negative women; 3885 (3.2%) were screen positive but had no subsequent diagnosis of breast cancer. Overall sensitivity was 86.6% and specificity was 96.8%. Three factors had an adverse effect on both measures: use of hormone replacement therapy (sensitivity: 83.0% (95% confidence interval 77.4% to 87.6%), 84.7% (73.9% to 91.6%), and 92.1% (87.6% to 95.0%); specificity: 96.8% (96.6% to 97.0%), 97.8% (97.5% to 98.0%), and 98.1% (98.0% to 98.2%), respectively, for current, past, and never use); previous breast surgery v no previous breast surgery (sensitivity: 83.5% (75.7% to 89.1%) v 89.4% (86.5% to 91.8%); specificity: 96.2% (95.8% to 96.5%) v 97.4% (97.3% to 97.5%), respectively); and body mass index < 25 v > or = 25 (sensitivity: 85.7% (81.2% to 89.3%) v 91.0% (87.5% to 93.6%); specificity: 97.2% (97.0% to 97.3%) v 97.4% (97.3% to 97.6%), respectively). Neither sensitivity nor specificity varied significantly according to age, family history of breast cancer, parity, past oral contraceptive use, tubal ligation, physical activity, smoking, or alcohol consumption.
Conclusions: The efficiency, and possibly the effectiveness, of mammographic screening is lower in users of hormone replacement therapy, in women with previous breast surgery, and in thin women compared with other women.
Similar articles
-
Effect of estrogen replacement therapy on the specificity and sensitivity of screening mammography.J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996 May 15;88(10):643-9. doi: 10.1093/jnci/88.10.643. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996. PMID: 8627640
-
Predictors of outcome of mammography in the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme.J Med Screen. 2002;9(2):74-82. doi: 10.1136/jms.9.2.74. J Med Screen. 2002. PMID: 12133927
-
Hormone replacement therapy, percent mammographic density, and sensitivity of mammography.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 May;14(5):1060-4. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0165. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005. PMID: 15894653
-
Hormone replacement therapy and the sensitivity and specificity of breast cancer screening: a review.J Med Screen. 2001;8(1):29-34. doi: 10.1136/jms.8.1.29. J Med Screen. 2001. PMID: 11373847 Review.
-
Hormone replacement therapy and mammographic screening.Clin Radiol. 2002 Jul;57(7):563-4. doi: 10.1053/crad.2002.0940. Clin Radiol. 2002. PMID: 12096852 Review.
Cited by
-
Assessment of the Breast Density Prevalence in Swiss Women with a Deep Convolutional Neural Network: A Cross-Sectional Study.Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Oct 3;14(19):2212. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14192212. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39410616 Free PMC article.
-
A Semiautonomous Deep Learning System to Reduce False Positives in Screening Mammography.Radiol Artif Intell. 2024 May;6(3):e230033. doi: 10.1148/ryai.230033. Radiol Artif Intell. 2024. PMID: 38597785 Free PMC article.
-
Frequency of Consuming Breakfast Meals and After-Dinner Snacks Is not Associated with Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Risk: Women's Health Initiative Observational Study.J Nutr. 2023 Apr;153(4):1089-1100. doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2023.02.003. Epub 2023 Feb 8. J Nutr. 2023. PMID: 36828152 Free PMC article.
-
Development and validation of a deep learning model for detection of breast cancers in mammography from multi-institutional datasets.PLoS One. 2022 Mar 24;17(3):e0265751. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265751. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35324962 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the Pink Luminous Breast LED-Based Technology Device as a Screening Tool for the Early Detection of Breast Abnormalities.Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Feb 10;8:805182. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.805182. eCollection 2021. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 35223883 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Banks E, Reeves G, Beral V, Bull D, Crossley B, Simmonds M, et al. Predictors of outcome of mammography in the National Health Service breast screening programme. J Med Screen 2002;9: 74-82. - PubMed
-
- Million Women Study Collaborators. Breast cancer and hormone-replacement therapy in the Million Women Study. Lancet 2003;362: 419-27. - PubMed
-
- Million Women Study Collaborators. Patterns of use of hormone replacement therapy in one million women in Britain, 1996-2000. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2002;109: 1319-30. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous