Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2004 Sep 4;329(7465):548.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.38210.494977.DE. Epub 2004 Aug 27.

Effect of lactobacillus in preventing post-antibiotic vulvovaginal candidiasis: a randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Effect of lactobacillus in preventing post-antibiotic vulvovaginal candidiasis: a randomised controlled trial

Marie Pirotta et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To test whether oral or vaginal lactobacillus can prevent vulvovaginitis after antibiotic treatment.

Design: Randomised, placebo controlled, double blind, factorial 2x2 trial.

Setting: Fifty general practices and 16 pharmacies in Melbourne, Australia.

Participants: Non-pregnant women aged 18-50 years who required a short course of oral antibiotics for a non-gynaecological infection: 278 were enrolled in the study, and results were available for 235.

Interventions: Lactobacillus preparations taken orally or vaginally, or both, from enrollment until four days after completion of their antibiotic course.

Main outcome measures: Participants' reports of symptoms of post-antibiotic vulvovaginitis, with microbiological evidence of candidiasis provided by a self obtained vaginal swab.

Results: Overall, 55/235 (23% (95% confidence interval 18% to 29%)) women developed post-antibiotic vulvovaginitis. Compared with placebo, the odds ratio for developing post-antibiotic vulvovaginitis with oral lactobacillus was 1.06 (95% confidence interval 0.58 to 1.94) and with vaginal lactobacillus 1.38 (0.75 to 2.54). Compliance with antibiotics and interventions was high. The trial was terminated after the second interim analysis because of lack of effect of the interventions. Given the data at this time, the chances of detecting a significant reduction in vulvovaginitis with oral or vaginal lactobacillus treatment were less than 0.032 and 0.0006 respectively if the trial proceeded to full enrollment.

Conclusions: The use of oral or vaginal forms of lactobacillus to prevent post-antibiotic vulvovaginitis is not supported by these results. Further research on this subject is unlikely to be fruitful, unless new understandings about the pathogenesis of post-antibiotic vulvovaginitis indicate a possible role for lactobacillus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant flow through study

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. MacLennan A, Wilson D, Taylor A. The escalating cost and prevalence of alternative medicine. Prev Med 2002;35: 166-73. - PubMed
    1. Eisenberg D, Davis R, Ettner S, Appel S, Wilkey S, Van Rompay M, et al. Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990-1997. JAMA 1998;280: 1569-75. - PubMed
    1. Mombelli B, Gismondo MR. The use of probiotics in medical practice. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2000;16: 531-6. - PubMed
    1. Pirotta M, Gunn J, Chondros P. “Not thrush again!” Women's experience of post-antibiotic vulvovaginitis. Med J Aust 2003;179: 43-6. - PubMed
    1. Nyirjesy P, Weitz M, Grody T, Lorber B. Over-the-counter and alternative medicines in the treatment of chronic vaginal symptoms. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90: 50-3. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances