Comparison of self-rated and clinician-rated measures of depressive symptoms: a naturalistic study
- PMID: 15355586
- DOI: 10.1348/1476083041839349
Comparison of self-rated and clinician-rated measures of depressive symptoms: a naturalistic study
Abstract
In order to assess the concordance between self-rating and clinician's assessment tools of depression, as well as factors involved in the differences between auto and hetero evaluation, 198 depressed in-patients were assessed at admission and at discharge using the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (10-item version, MADRS) and the self-rating scale Symptoms CheckList (90-item version, SCL-90). We found that about 18% of patients overestimated and about 15% underestimated their depressive symptomatology (SCL-90 depression subscale) relative to the psychiatrist's assessment. Logistic regression analysis showed that the presence of personality disorders and previous history of psychiatric disorders predicted the overestimating group. Discriminant analysis showed that approximately 75% of participants were correctly classified when previous history of psychiatric disorders, presence of personality disorders and age were entered separately into the equation.
Similar articles
-
Self- and clinician-rated Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale: evaluation in clinical practice.J Affect Disord. 2010 Mar;121(3):268-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.06.037. Epub 2009 Aug 5. J Affect Disord. 2010. PMID: 19660815
-
Factor analysis of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale.Depression. 1996;4(1):31-3. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-7162(1996)4:1<31::AID-DEPR3>3.0.CO;2-I. Depression. 1996. PMID: 9160651
-
The relationship of demographic, clinical, cognitive and personality variables to the discrepancy between self and clinician rated depression.J Affect Disord. 2010 Jul;124(1-2):202-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.11.011. Epub 2009 Dec 9. J Affect Disord. 2010. PMID: 20004477
-
The validity of self-rated psychotic symptoms in depressed inpatients.Eur Psychiatry. 2012 Oct;27(7):547-52. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2011.01.004. Epub 2011 Mar 9. Eur Psychiatry. 2012. PMID: 21392943
-
Rating depressed patients: observer- vs self-assessment.Eur Psychiatry. 2000 May;15(3):160-72. doi: 10.1016/s0924-9338(00)00229-7. Eur Psychiatry. 2000. PMID: 10881213 Review.
Cited by
-
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 vs. the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression in Assessing Major Depressive Disorder.Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 4;12:747139. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.747139. eCollection 2021. Front Psychiatry. 2021. PMID: 34803766 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of the Mental Health Impact of COVID-19 on Vulnerable and Non-Vulnerable Groups: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 15;18(20):10830. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010830. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34682574 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The relationship between individual characteristics and HIV-related stigma in adults living with HIV: medical monitoring project, Florida, 2015-2016.BMC Public Health. 2020 May 19;20(1):723. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08891-3. BMC Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32429947 Free PMC article.
-
Concordance between clinician-rated and patient reported outcome measures of depressive symptoms in treatment resistant depression.J Affect Disord. 2020 Apr 1;266:22-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.108. Epub 2020 Jan 22. J Affect Disord. 2020. PMID: 32056880 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of borderline personality disorder and sub-threshold borderline personality disorder on the course of self-reported and clinician-rated depression in self-harming adolescents.Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2017 Oct 31;4:22. doi: 10.1186/s40479-017-0073-5. eCollection 2017. Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2017. PMID: 29093819 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
