Femoropopliteal reconstruction with knitted, nonvelour Dacron versus expanded polytetrafluoroethylene

J Vasc Surg. 1992 Jul;16(1):60-5. doi: 10.1067/mva.1992.35441.

Abstract

No ideal prosthetic conduit exists for femoropopliteal reconstruction. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) has gained much greater popularity than the less expensive Dacron, despite disappointing long-term patency for each material. Few direct comparisons of results with the two materials have been performed. The concurrent experience of a single surgeon with femoropopliteal reconstructions of PTFE (n = 85) or knitted, nonvelour Dacron (KNVD, n = 38) was reviewed. Risk factors were comparable in the two groups. Overall patency was significantly better for KNVD than for PTFE (p = 0.0096 by log rank; p = 0.039 by Cox proportional hazards; 48% vs 27% at 5 years). Since in this series the overall performance of KNVD was significantly better than PTFE, a reassessment of the prosthetic materials used in femoropopliteal reconstruction is necessary. These results justify a prospective comparison of PTFE and KNVD.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Arterial Occlusive Diseases / surgery
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis*
  • Female
  • Femoral Artery / physiopathology
  • Femoral Artery / surgery*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Polyethylene Terephthalates*
  • Polytetrafluoroethylene*
  • Popliteal Artery / physiopathology
  • Popliteal Artery / surgery*
  • Porosity
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Vascular Patency

Substances

  • Polyethylene Terephthalates
  • Polytetrafluoroethylene