Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination
- PMID: 15367553
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.292.11.1317
Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination
Abstract
Context: Current recommendations for women who have a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation are to undergo breast surveillance from age 25 years onward with mammography annually and clinical breast examination (CBE) every 6 months; however, many tumors are detected at a relatively advanced stage. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound may improve the ability to detect breast cancer at an early stage.
Objective: To compare the sensitivity and specificity of 4 methods of breast cancer surveillance (mammography, ultrasound, MRI, and CBE) in women with hereditary susceptibility to breast cancer due to a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.
Design, setting, and participants: A surveillance study of 236 Canadian women aged 25 to 65 years with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations who underwent 1 to 3 annual screening examinations, consisting of MRI, mammography, and ultrasound at a single tertiary care teaching hospital between November 3, 1997, and March 31, 2003. On the day of imaging and at 6-month intervals, CBE was performed.
Main outcome measures: Sensitivity and specificity of each of the 4 surveillance modalities, and sensitivity of all 4 screening modalities vs mammography and CBE.
Results: Each imaging modality was read independently by a radiologist and scored on a 5-point Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System scale. All lesions with a score of 4 or 5 (suspicious or highly suspicious for malignancy) were biopsied. There were 22 cancers detected (16 invasive and 6 ductal carcinoma in situ). Of these, 17 (77%) were detected by MRI vs 8 (36%) by mammography, 7 (33%) by ultrasound, and 2 (9.1%) by CBE. The sensitivity and specificity (based on biopsy rates) were 77% and 95.4% for MRI, 36% and 99.8% for mammography, 33% and 96% for ultrasound, and 9.1% and 99.3% for CBE, respectively. There was 1 interval cancer. All 4 screening modalities combined had a sensitivity of 95% vs 45% for mammography and CBE combined.
Conclusions: In BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, MRI is more sensitive for detecting breast cancers than mammography, ultrasound, or CBE alone. Whether surveillance regimens that include MRI will reduce mortality from breast cancer in high-risk women requires further investigation.
Comment in
-
Breast MRI for women with hereditary cancer risk.JAMA. 2004 Sep 15;292(11):1368-70. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.11.1368. JAMA. 2004. PMID: 15367560 No abstract available.
-
Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers.JAMA. 2005 Feb 23;293(8):931; author reply 931. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.8.931-a. JAMA. 2005. PMID: 15728161 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of breast magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, and ultrasound for surveillance of women at high risk for hereditary breast cancer.J Clin Oncol. 2001 Aug 1;19(15):3524-31. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.15.3524. J Clin Oncol. 2001. PMID: 11481359
-
Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging.JAMA. 2006 May 24;295(20):2374-84. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.20.2374. JAMA. 2006. PMID: 16720823
-
A systematic review of the effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an addition to mammography and ultrasound in screening young women at high risk of breast cancer.Eur J Cancer. 2007 Sep;43(13):1905-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.06.007. Epub 2007 Aug 2. Eur J Cancer. 2007. PMID: 17681781 Review.
-
Effectiveness of alternating mammography and magnetic resonance imaging for screening women with deleterious BRCA mutations at high risk of breast cancer.Cancer. 2011 Sep 1;117(17):3900-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25971. Epub 2011 Mar 1. Cancer. 2011. PMID: 21365619
-
Screening for hereditary breast cancer.Semin Oncol. 2007 Oct;34(5):392-400. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2007.07.002. Semin Oncol. 2007. PMID: 17920893 Review.
Cited by
-
Performance of breast MRI for high-risk screening during lactation.Eur Radiol. 2024 Oct 31. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11091-x. Online ahead of print. Eur Radiol. 2024. PMID: 39480534
-
Prevalence, prognosis, and health care resource utilization in carriers of pathogenic germline variants in BRCA1/2 with incident early-stage breast cancer: a Finnish population-based study.Acta Oncol. 2024 Sep 25;63:736-745. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2024.40829. Acta Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39319938 Free PMC article.
-
PROMRIINE (PRe-operatory Magnetic Resonance Imaging is INEffective) Study: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Impact of Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Surgical Decisions and Clinical Outcomes in Women with Breast Cancer.Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Nov;31(12):8021-8029. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15833-5. Epub 2024 Jul 27. Ann Surg Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39068322 Free PMC article.
-
Participation in a High-Risk Program Is Associated with a Diagnosis of Earlier-Stage Disease Among Women at Increased Risk for Breast Cancer Development.Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Oct;31(10):6764-6773. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15633-x. Epub 2024 Jun 29. Ann Surg Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38949720
-
Clinical Outcomes for BRCA Pathogenic Variant Carriers With Breast Cancer Undergoing Breast Conservation.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2418486. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.18486. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 38916888 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
