Conscious and effortful or effortless and automatic: a practice/performance paradox in motor learning

Percept Mot Skills. 2004 Aug;99(1):315-24. doi: 10.2466/pms.99.1.315-324.

Abstract

High cognitive effort has been frequently related to better indices of motor learning through the study of many different paradigms. However, automaticity presumably invokes minimal cognitive processing but has often been related to high-level motor performance, which suggests a paradox. The objective of this study was to approach this paradox by examining the viability of the use of different cognitive strategies during practice and performance which promote the benefits of high cognitive effort and automaticity. Members of the university community (14 men and 15 women) divided into 3 groups practiced a discrete precision task. All participants completed four sessions totaling 320 trials and were tested on retention and transfer seven days later. Findings suggest that it is indeed possible to benefit from both effortful and minimal cognitive processing strategies and that they should be used complementarily.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Automatism*
  • Cognition
  • Consciousness*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Learning*
  • Male
  • Practice, Psychological*
  • Psychomotor Performance*
  • Retention, Psychology