The press-fit Kinemax knee arthroplasty. High failure rate of non-cemented implants

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992 Mar;74(2):243-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.74B2.1544961.

Abstract

We report the results of 75 consecutive primary press-fit Kinemax arthroplasties with an average follow-up of 14 months (three to 28). We reviewed 26 cemented and 49 non-cemented tibial components implanted into 72 patients (30 men and 42 women, median age 70 years). At the latest follow-up the overall evaluation (Hospital for Special Surgery knee rating scale) for cemented cases was excellent in 54%, good in 42% and poor in 4%. No cemented prosthesis loosened. Of the non-cemented cases 55% were excellent, 23% good, and 2% fair. Ten tibial implants (20%) loosened and required revision. Residual pain marred the result in 24% of the non-cemented prostheses and in 4% of the cemented group. We do not recommend the press-fit, smooth-surfaced Kinemax prosthesis for non-cemented use.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Arthritis, Rheumatoid / diagnostic imaging
  • Arthritis, Rheumatoid / epidemiology
  • Arthritis, Rheumatoid / surgery
  • Bone Cements / therapeutic use*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Knee Joint / diagnostic imaging
  • Knee Prosthesis* / statistics & numerical data
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Osteoarthritis / diagnostic imaging
  • Osteoarthritis / epidemiology
  • Osteoarthritis / surgery
  • Prosthesis Design / statistics & numerical data
  • Prosthesis Failure
  • Radiography
  • Reoperation / statistics & numerical data

Substances

  • Bone Cements