Spatial constraints on visual-tactile cross-modal distractor congruency effects
- PMID: 15460922
- DOI: 10.3758/cabn.4.2.148
Spatial constraints on visual-tactile cross-modal distractor congruency effects
Abstract
Across three experiments, participants made speeded elevation discrimination responses to vibrotactile targets presented to the thumb (held in a lower position) or the index finger (upper position) of either hand, while simultaneously trying to ignore visual distractors presented independently from either the same or a different elevation. Performance on the vibrotactile elevation discrimination task was slower and less accurate when the visual distractor was incongruent with the elevation of the vibrotactile target (e.g., a lower light during the presentation of an upper vibrotactile target to the index finger) than when they were congruent, showing that people cannot completely ignore vision when selectively attending to vibrotactile information. We investigated the attentional, temporal, and spatial modulation of these cross-modal congruency effects by manipulating the direction of endogenous tactile spatial attention, the stimulus onset asynchrony between target and distractor, and the spatial separation between the vibrotactile target, any visual distractors, and the participant's two hands within and across hemifields. Our results provide new insights into the spatiotemporal modulation of cross-modal congruency effects and highlight the utility of this paradigm for investigating the contributions of visual, tactile, and proprioceptive inputs to the multisensory representation of peripersonal space.
Similar articles
-
Temporal aspects of the visuotactile congruency effect.Neurosci Lett. 2006 Jan 9;392(1-2):96-100. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.09.001. Epub 2005 Oct 6. Neurosci Lett. 2006. PMID: 16213655
-
Vision of a pictorial hand modulates visual-tactile interactions.Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2004 Jun;4(2):182-92. doi: 10.3758/cabn.4.2.182. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2004. PMID: 15460924
-
On the inability to ignore touch when responding to vision in the crossmodal congruency task.Acta Psychol (Amst). 2005 Jan-Feb;118(1-2):47-70. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.10.003. Epub 2004 Nov 23. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2005. PMID: 15627409
-
Multisensory contributions to the 3-D representation of visuotactile peripersonal space in humans: evidence from the crossmodal congruency task.J Physiol Paris. 2004 Jan-Jun;98(1-3):171-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2004.03.008. J Physiol Paris. 2004. PMID: 15477031 Review.
-
Vision affects tactile target and distractor processing even when space is task-irrelevant.Front Psychol. 2014 Feb 6;5:84. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00084. eCollection 2014. Front Psychol. 2014. PMID: 24567727 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Temporal Electroencephalography Traits Dissociating Tactile Information and Cross-Modal Congruence Effects.Sensors (Basel). 2023 Dec 21;24(1):45. doi: 10.3390/s24010045. Sensors (Basel). 2023. PMID: 38202907 Free PMC article.
-
The left-right reversed visual feedback of the hand affects multisensory interaction within peripersonal space.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Jan;86(1):285-294. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02788-0. Epub 2023 Sep 27. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024. PMID: 37759149 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond peripersonal boundaries: insights from crossmodal interactions.Cogn Process. 2024 Feb;25(1):121-132. doi: 10.1007/s10339-023-01154-0. Epub 2023 Sep 1. Cogn Process. 2024. PMID: 37656270 Free PMC article.
-
Individual-based predominance of visual input in multisensorial integration for balance is correlated with proprioceptive drift in rubber hand illusion.Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 24;13(1):11905. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39253-9. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37488214 Free PMC article.
-
Close to me but unreachable: spotting the link between peripersonal space and empathy.Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2023 Jun 12;18(1):nsad030. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsad030. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2023. PMID: 37243725 Free PMC article.