Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients
- PMID: 15470212
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa040127
Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients
Abstract
Background: Carotid endarterectomy is more effective than medical management in the prevention of stroke in patients with severe symptomatic or asymptomatic atherosclerotic carotid-artery stenosis. Stenting with the use of an emboli-protection device is a less invasive revascularization strategy than endarterectomy in carotid-artery disease.
Methods: We conducted a randomized trial comparing carotid-artery stenting with the use of an emboli-protection device to endarterectomy in 334 patients with coexisting conditions that potentially increased the risk posed by endarterectomy and who had either a symptomatic carotid-artery stenosis of at least 50 percent of the luminal diameter or an asymptomatic stenosis of at least 80 percent. The primary end point of the study was the cumulative incidence of a major cardiovascular event at 1 year--a composite of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction within 30 days after the intervention or death or ipsilateral stroke between 31 days and 1 year. The study was designed to test the hypothesis that the less invasive strategy, stenting, was not inferior to endarterectomy.
Results: The primary end point occurred in 20 patients randomly assigned to undergo carotid-artery stenting with an emboli-protection device (cumulative incidence, 12.2 percent) and in 32 patients randomly assigned to undergo endarterectomy (cumulative incidence, 20.1 percent; absolute difference, -7.9 percentage points; 95 percent confidence interval, -16.4 to 0.7 percentage points; P=0.004 for noninferiority, and P=0.053 for superiority). At one year, carotid revascularization was repeated in fewer patients who had received stents than in those who had undergone endarterectomy (cumulative incidence, 0.6 percent vs. 4.3 percent; P=0.04).
Conclusions: Among patients with severe carotid-artery stenosis and coexisting conditions, carotid stenting with the use of an emboli-protection device is not inferior to carotid endarterectomy.
Copyright 2004 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Comment in
-
Stenting for carotid-artery stenosis.N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 7;351(15):1565-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe048234. N Engl J Med. 2004. PMID: 15470220 No abstract available.
-
Carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy.N Engl J Med. 2005 Feb 10;352(6):624-7; author reply 624-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200502103520618. N Engl J Med. 2005. PMID: 15703431 No abstract available.
-
Carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy.N Engl J Med. 2005 Feb 10;352(6):624-7; author reply 624-7. N Engl J Med. 2005. PMID: 15706641 No abstract available.
-
Carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy.N Engl J Med. 2005 Feb 10;352(6):624-7; author reply 624-7. N Engl J Med. 2005. PMID: 15706642 No abstract available.
-
Carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy.N Engl J Med. 2005 Feb 10;352(6):624-7; author reply 624-7. N Engl J Med. 2005. PMID: 15706643 No abstract available.
-
Stenting was noninferior to endarterectomy in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis and coexisting conditions.ACP J Club. 2005 Mar-Apr;142(2):41. ACP J Club. 2005. PMID: 15739988 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Long-term results of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients.N Engl J Med. 2008 Apr 10;358(15):1572-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0708028. N Engl J Med. 2008. PMID: 18403765 Clinical Trial.
-
Carotid artery revascularization in high surgical risk patients with the NexStent and the Filterwire EX/EZ: 1-year results in the CABERNET trial.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Jun 1;71(7):950-60. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21564. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008. PMID: 18412236 Clinical Trial.
-
Carotid Revascularization Using Endarterectomy or Stenting Systems (CaRESS) phase I clinical trial: 1-year results.J Vasc Surg. 2005 Aug;42(2):213-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.04.023. J Vasc Surg. 2005. PMID: 16102616 Clinical Trial.
-
Endovascular stenting or carotid endarterectomy for treatment of carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis.J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011 Dec;25(6):1024-9. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.01.009. Epub 2011 Mar 12. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011. PMID: 21398144 Review.
-
Carotid artery stenting vs. endarterectomy.Eur Heart J. 2009 Nov;30(22):2693-704. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp471. Epub 2009 Oct 27. Eur Heart J. 2009. PMID: 19861324 Review.
Cited by
-
Current Status of Carotid Artery Stenting.Interv Radiol (Higashimatsuyama). 2023 Feb 9;9(3):122-126. doi: 10.22575/interventionalradiology.2022-0020. eCollection 2024 Nov 1. Interv Radiol (Higashimatsuyama). 2023. PMID: 39559811 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Outcome of tailored antiplatelet therapy in carotid stenting: a retrospective comparative study.CVIR Endovasc. 2024 Oct 9;7(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s42155-024-00482-2. CVIR Endovasc. 2024. PMID: 39379742 Free PMC article.
-
Subacute in-stent thrombosis after carotid artery stenting in a patient with gene polymorphisms associated with aspirin and clopidogrel resistance: a case report.Thromb J. 2024 Oct 3;22(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12959-024-00660-1. Thromb J. 2024. PMID: 39363335 Free PMC article.
-
Photon-Counting Computed Tomography Angiography of Carotid Arteries: A Topical Narrative Review with Case Examples.Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Sep 11;14(18):2012. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14182012. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39335691 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Emergency Carotid Thrombo-Endarterectomy after Failed Endovascular Recanalization for Acute Complete Carotid Occlusion: A Case Report.Brain Sci. 2024 Aug 30;14(9):882. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14090882. Brain Sci. 2024. PMID: 39335378 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources