Comparison of surgical site and patient's history with a simplified risk score for the prediction of postoperative nausea and vomiting

Anaesthesia. 2004 Nov;59(11):1078-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03875.x.

Abstract

Although site of surgery and previous occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting are often used to decide whether prophylactic anti-emetic drugs are indicated, the value of these predictors is unclear. We compared these two risk factors against a simplified four-factor risk score. We analysed data from 1566 adult inpatients who received balanced anaesthesia without prophylactic anti-emetics. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive value and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were used to quantify predictive properties. Nausea and vomiting occurred in 600 (38.3%) patients within 24 h. Sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 47% and 59% for surgical site; 47% and 70% for history of postoperative nausea and vomiting; and 58% and 70% for risk score with three or more factors. The area under the curve for surgical site was 0.53 (95% CI 0.50-0.56); that for patient's history was 0.58 (95% CI 0.56-0.61) while for risk score it was 0.68 (95% CI 0.66-0.71; P < 0.001). Prediction using surgical site or patient's history alone was poor while the simplified risk score provided clinically useful sensitivity and specificity.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Anesthesia, General
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting / diagnosis
  • Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting / etiology*
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Recurrence
  • Risk Assessment / methods
  • Risk Factors
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Surgical Procedures, Operative / adverse effects