Effect of antihypertensive agents on cardiovascular events in patients with coronary disease and normal blood pressure: the CAMELOT study: a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 15536108
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.292.18.2217
Effect of antihypertensive agents on cardiovascular events in patients with coronary disease and normal blood pressure: the CAMELOT study: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Context: The effect of antihypertensive drugs on cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and normal blood pressure remains uncertain.
Objective: To compare the effects of amlodipine or enalapril vs placebo on cardiovascular events in patients with CAD.
Design, setting, and participants: Double-blind, randomized, multicenter, 24-month trial (enrollment April 1999-April 2002) comparing amlodipine or enalapril with placebo in 1991 patients with angiographically documented CAD (>20% stenosis by coronary angiography) and diastolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg. A substudy of 274 patients measured atherosclerosis progression by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).
Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive amlodipine, 10 mg; enalapril, 20 mg; or placebo. IVUS was performed at baseline and study completion.
Main outcome measures: The primary efficacy parameter was incidence of cardiovascular events for amlodipine vs placebo. Other outcomes included comparisons of amlodipine vs enalapril and enalapril vs placebo. Events included cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, coronary revascularization, hospitalization for angina pectoris, hospitalization for congestive heart failure, fatal or nonfatal stroke or transient ischemic attack, and new diagnosis of peripheral vascular disease. The IVUS end point was change in percent atheroma volume.
Results: Baseline blood pressure averaged 129/78 mm Hg for all patients; it increased by 0.7/0.6 mm Hg in the placebo group and decreased by 4.8/2.5 mm Hg and 4.9/2.4 mm Hg in the amlodipine and enalapril groups, respectively (P<.001 for both vs placebo). Cardiovascular events occurred in 151 (23.1%) placebo-treated patients, in 110 (16.6%) amlodipine-treated patients (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.54-0.88 [P = .003]), and in 136 (20.2%) enalapril-treated patients (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.67-1.07 [P = .16]. Primary end point comparison for enalapril vs amlodipine was not significant (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.63-1.04 [P = .10]). The IVUS substudy showed a trend toward less progression of atherosclerosis in the amlodipine group vs placebo (P = .12), with significantly less progression in the subgroup with systolic blood pressures greater than the mean (P = .02). Compared with baseline, IVUS showed progression in the placebo group (P<.001), a trend toward progression in the enalapril group (P = .08), and no progression in the amlodipine group (P = .31). For the amlodipine group, correlation between blood pressure reduction and progression was r = 0.19, P = .07.
Conclusions: Administration of amlodipine to patients with CAD and normal blood pressure resulted in reduced adverse cardiovascular events. Directionally similar, but smaller and nonsignificant, treatment effects were observed with enalapril. For amlodipine, IVUS showed evidence of slowing of atherosclerosis progression.
Comment in
-
What is the optimal blood pressure and drug therapy for patients with coronary artery disease?JAMA. 2004 Nov 10;292(18):2271-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.18.2271. JAMA. 2004. PMID: 15536116 No abstract available.
-
Antihypertensive agents and cardiovascular events in patients with coronary disease and normal blood pressure.JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1187-8; author reply 1188-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.10.1187-b. JAMA. 2005. PMID: 15755936 No abstract available.
-
Antihypertensive agents and cardiovascular events in patients with coronary disease and normal blood pressure.JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1187; author reply 1188-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.10.1187-a. JAMA. 2005. PMID: 15755937 No abstract available.
-
Antihypertensive agents and cardiovascular events in patients with coronary disease and normal blood pressure.JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1188; author reply 1188-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.10.1188-a. JAMA. 2005. PMID: 15755938 No abstract available.
-
PEACE and CAMELOT.Prev Cardiol. 2005 Spring;8(2):127-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1520-037x.2005.4006.x. Prev Cardiol. 2005. PMID: 15860991 No abstract available.
-
Clinical trials report. Vascular effects beyond blood pressure: the CAMELOT study.Curr Hypertens Rep. 2005 Aug;7(4):235-7. doi: 10.1007/s11906-005-0017-0. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2005. PMID: 16061038 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Antihypertensive therapy and regression of coronary artery disease: insights from the Comparison of Amlodipine versus Enalapril to Limit Occurrences of Thrombosis (CAMELOT) and Norvasc for Regression of Manifest Atherosclerotic Lesions by Intravascular Sonographic Evaluation (NORMALISE) trials.Am Heart J. 2006 Dec;152(6):1059-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.07.022. Am Heart J. 2006. PMID: 17161053
-
Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT).JAMA. 2002 Dec 18;288(23):2981-97. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.23.2981. JAMA. 2002. PMID: 12479763 Clinical Trial.
-
Relationship of antihypertensive treatment to plasma markers of vascular inflammation and remodeling in the Comparison of Amlodipine versus Enalapril to Limit Occurrences of Thrombosis study.Am Heart J. 2012 Apr;163(4):735-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.12.008. Am Heart J. 2012. PMID: 22520542 Clinical Trial.
-
A Systematic Review on the Efficacy of Amlodipine in the Treatment of Patients With Hypertension With Concomitant Diabetes Mellitus and/or Renal Dysfunction, When Compared With Other Classes of Antihypertensive Medication.Am J Ther. 2015 Sep-Oct;22(5):322-41. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000202. Am J Ther. 2015. PMID: 25738570 Review.
-
Has the controversy over the use of calcium channel blockers in coronary artery disease been resolved?Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2005 May;6(5):831-4. doi: 10.1517/14656566.6.5.831. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2005. PMID: 15934908 Review.
Cited by
-
The 10 top prescribed medicines in Germany from 1985 to 2022: pharmacological analysis.Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2024 Nov 21. doi: 10.1007/s00210-024-03615-5. Online ahead of print. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2024. PMID: 39570381
-
From Cells to Plaques: The Molecular Pathways of Coronary Artery Calcification and Disease.J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 23;13(21):6352. doi: 10.3390/jcm13216352. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39518492 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Is fluid retention a cardiovascular risk factor?Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2024;88(2):277-288. doi: 10.3233/CH-242128. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2024. PMID: 39302357 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Association of office blood pressure with ischemic and bleeding events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 2;14(1):20310. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71060-8. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39218965 Free PMC article.
-
Update of the clinical guideline for hypertension diagnosis and treatment in Iran.Clin Hypertens. 2024 Jun 1;30(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40885-024-00269-6. Clin Hypertens. 2024. PMID: 38822442 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
