Population based randomised controlled trial on impact of screening on mortality from abdominal aortic aneurysm
- PMID: 15545293
- PMCID: PMC534438
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38272.478438.55
Population based randomised controlled trial on impact of screening on mortality from abdominal aortic aneurysm
Erratum in
- BMJ. 2005 Mar 12;330(7491):596
Abstract
Objective: To assess whether screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms in men reduces mortality.
Design: Population based randomised controlled trial of ultrasound screening, with intention to treat analysis of age standardised mortality.
Setting: Community based screening programme in Western Australia.
Participants: 41,000 men aged 65-83 years randomised to intervention and control groups.
Intervention: Invitation to ultrasound screening.
Main outcome measure: Deaths from abdominal aortic aneurysm in the five years after the start of screening.
Results: The corrected response to invitation to screening was 70%. The crude prevalence was 7.2% for aortic diameter > or = 30 mm and 0.5% for diameter > or = 55 mm. Twice as many men in the intervention group than in the control group underwent elective surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm (107 v 54, P = 0.002, chi2 test). Between scheduled screening and the end of follow up 18 men in the intervention group and 25 in the control group died from abdominal aortic aneurysm, yielding a mortality ratio of 0.61 (95% confidence interval 0.33 to 1.11). Any benefit was almost entirely in men aged between 65 and 75 years, where the ratio was reduced to 0.19 (0.04 to 0.89).
Conclusions: At a whole population level screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms was not effective in men aged 65-83 years and did not reduce overall death rates. The success of screening depends on choice of target age group and the exclusion of ineligible men. It is also important to assess the current rate of elective surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm as in some communities this may already approach a level that reduces the potential benefit of population based screening.
Figures
Comment in
-
Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: screening reduces deaths related to aneurysm.BMJ. 2005 Mar 12;330(7491):601; author reply 601-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7491.601-a. BMJ. 2005. PMID: 15761006 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: headline is misleading.BMJ. 2005 Mar 12;330(7491):601; author reply 601-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7491.601. BMJ. 2005. PMID: 15761007 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial.Lancet. 2002 Nov 16;360(9345):1531-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)11522-4. Lancet. 2002. PMID: 12443589 Clinical Trial.
-
Initial results of ultrasound screening for aneurysm of the abdominal aorta in Western Australia: relevance for endoluminal treatment of aneurysm disease.Cardiovasc Surg. 2001 Jun;9(3):234-40. doi: 10.1016/s0967-2109(00)00143-5. Cardiovasc Surg. 2001. PMID: 11336846 Clinical Trial.
-
Multicentre aneurysm screening study (MASS): cost effectiveness analysis of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms based on four year results from randomised controlled trial.BMJ. 2002 Nov 16;325(7373):1135. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7373.1135. BMJ. 2002. PMID: 12433761 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A systematic review of short-term vs long-term effectiveness of one-time abdominal aortic aneurysm screening in men with ultrasound.J Vasc Surg. 2018 Aug;68(2):612-623. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.03.411. J Vasc Surg. 2018. PMID: 30037679 Review.
-
Screening, diagnosis and advances in aortic aneurysm surgery.Gerontology. 2004 Nov-Dec;50(6):349-59. doi: 10.1159/000080172. Gerontology. 2004. PMID: 15477695 Review.
Cited by
-
Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in Sweden vs. Finland: benefits of population-wide screening.Eur Heart J. 2024 Nov 21;45(44):4747-4757. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae665. Eur Heart J. 2024. PMID: 39374339 Free PMC article.
-
Multimodality magnetic resonance evaluating the effect of enhanced physical exercise on the growth rate, flow haemodynamics, aneurysm wall and ventricular-aortic coupling of patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA MOVE trial): a study protocol for an open-label randomised controlled trial.BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 13;14(2):e080073. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080073. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 38355193 Free PMC article.
-
Modern management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Dec 12;10:1323465. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1323465. eCollection 2023. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023. PMID: 38149264 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Diagnostic Utility of a Combined MPO/D-Dimer Score to Distinguish Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm from Peripheral Artery Disease.J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 7;12(24):7558. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247558. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 38137627 Free PMC article.
-
Brazilian Society for Angiology and Vascular Surgery guidelines on abdominal aortic aneurysm.J Vasc Bras. 2023 Oct 30;22:e20230040. doi: 10.1590/1677-5449.202300402. eCollection 2023. J Vasc Bras. 2023. PMID: 38021279 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Semmens J, Lawrence-Brown M, Norman P, Codde J, Holman C. The quality of surgical care project: benchmark standards of open resection for abdominal aortic aneurysm in Western Australia. Aust N Z J Surg 1998;68: 404-10. - PubMed
-
- Semmens JB, Norman PE, Lawrence-Brown MMD, Bass AJ, Holman CDJ. The incidence of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in Western Australia for 1985-94: a population-based record linkage study. Br J Surg 1998;87: 191-4. - PubMed
-
- Reitsma JB, Pleumeekers HJCM, Hoes AW, Kleijnen J, de Groot RM, Jacobs MJ, et al. Increasing incidence of aneurysms of the abdominal aorta in the Netherlands. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1996;12: 446-51. - PubMed
-
- Scott RAP, Ashton HA, Kay DN. Abdominal aortic aneurysm in 4237 screened patients: prevalence development and management over 6 years. Br J Surg 1991;78: 1122-5. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources