Interactions between cognitive and sensorimotor functions in the motor cortex: evidence from the preparatory motor sets anticipating a perturbation
- PMID: 15575492
- DOI: 10.1515/revneuro.2004.15.5.371
Interactions between cognitive and sensorimotor functions in the motor cortex: evidence from the preparatory motor sets anticipating a perturbation
Abstract
The many signs of cognitive processes in the activation pattern of the primary motor cortex or in corticospinal (CS) excitability gave rise to the idea that the motor cortex is a crucial node in the processing of cognitive information related to sensorimotor functions. Moreover, it became clear that the preparatory motor sets offer a privileged window to investigate the interaction between cognitive and sensorimotor function in the motor cortex. In the present review, we examine how the study of the preparatory motor sets anticipating a mechanical movement perturbation contributes to enlightening this question. Following the initial observation made by Hammond that some components of the stretch reflex can be modulated by a prior intention either to resist or to relax in response to a subsequent perturbation, first evidence of the phenomenon was obtained in behaving monkeys. Moreover, this study related this peripheral fact to the observed anticipatory activity of motor cortex neurons after a prior instruction telling the animal how to respond to the subsequent perturbation, which triggered the instructed movement. Indeed, this anticipatory activity was found to be different according to the instruction. In the 1980s, this work inspired a lot of studies in human beings that brought support to the idea of a cognitive tuning of the long latency stretch response (LLSR). Specifically, the MI component of the response was shown to be modulated by a prior intent to resist versus to let go when faced with the perturbation. Recently, new approaches have been developed to obtain evidence of a cognitive tuning of CS excitability, thanks to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). TMS has been used both as a reliable tool for quantifying the CS excitability via the motor evoked potentials (MEPs), and to centrally perturb the organization of movement. Such central perturbations offer the unique opportunity to activate the descending motor tracts while shunting, for a short time period, the ascending tracts assisting the movement. Thus, CS excitability was measured before the movement was perturbed. These studies demonstrated the readiness of the CS tract to be involved in anticipatory compensatory responses to central movement perturbations induced by TMS in relation to the subject's cognitive attitudes. The question of the cerebral regions upstream of the motor cortex that could be responsible for this modulation in CS excitability remains largely open.
Similar articles
-
Direct evidence for a binding between cognitive and motor functions in humans: a TMS study.J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Nov 15;15(8):1207-16. doi: 10.1162/089892903322598157. J Cogn Neurosci. 2003. PMID: 14709237
-
Involvement of SMAp in the intention-related long latency stretch reflex modulation: a TMS study.Neuroscience. 2013 Aug 29;246:329-41. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.05.005. Epub 2013 May 11. Neuroscience. 2013. PMID: 23673280
-
Corticospinal control of wrist muscles during expectation of a motor perturbation: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.Behav Brain Res. 2009 Mar 17;198(2):459-65. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.11.031. Epub 2008 Nov 27. Behav Brain Res. 2009. PMID: 19073218
-
Effects of action observation on corticospinal excitability: Muscle specificity, direction, and timing of the mirror response.Neuropsychologia. 2014 Nov;64:331-48. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.09.034. Epub 2014 Oct 2. Neuropsychologia. 2014. PMID: 25281883 Review.
-
Investigating human motor control by transcranial magnetic stimulation.Exp Brain Res. 2003 Sep;152(1):1-16. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1537-y. Epub 2003 Jul 17. Exp Brain Res. 2003. PMID: 12879177 Review.
Cited by
-
Influence of age on neuromuscular control during a dynamic weight-bearing task.J Aging Phys Act. 2009 Jul;17(3):327-43. doi: 10.1123/japa.17.3.327. J Aging Phys Act. 2009. PMID: 19799103 Free PMC article.
-
Visually-updated hand state estimates modulate the proprioceptive reflex independently of motor task requirements.Elife. 2020 Mar 31;9:e52380. doi: 10.7554/eLife.52380. Elife. 2020. PMID: 32228855 Free PMC article.
-
Preparing for a motor perturbation: early implication of primary motor and somatosensory cortices.Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Feb;30(2):575-87. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20526. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009. PMID: 18172849 Free PMC article.
-
Diffuse optical tomography of pain and tactile stimulation: activation in cortical sensory and emotional systems.Neuroimage. 2008 Jun;41(2):252-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.047. Epub 2008 Feb 14. Neuroimage. 2008. PMID: 18394924 Free PMC article.
-
National Athletic Trainers' Association Position Statement: Reducing Intentional Head-First Contact Behavior in American Football Players.J Athl Train. 2022 Feb 1;57(2):113-124. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0062.21. J Athl Train. 2022. PMID: 35201304 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources