Comparative clinical study of cefcapene pivoxil and cefteram pivoxil in chronic respiratory tract infections by a double-blind method

J Int Med Res. 2004 Nov-Dec;32(6):590-607. doi: 10.1177/147323000403200604.

Abstract

In a double-blind study, the efficacy and safety of the novel cephem antibiotic cefcapene pivoxil (CFPN-PI; 450 mg/day) was compared with cefteram pivoxil (CFTM-PI; 600 mg/day) in 171 patients with chronic respiratory tract infections. There was no significant difference between the clinical efficacy of the two drugs (80.2% for CFPN-PI versus 78.9% for CFTM-PI). There was no significant difference in the rate of elimination of the causative bacteria (60.5% for CFPN-PI versus 65.9% for CFTM-PI). Side-effects were observed in 6.0% of patients treated with CFPN-PI compared with 6.4% of patients treated with CFTM-PI. There were no significant differences in incidence of abnormal laboratory findings following treatment with the two drugs (13.9% for each), and none of the side-effects was severe. We conclude that CFPN-PI (450 mg/day) was as effective and as well tolerated as CFTM-PI (600 mg/day) in the treatment of chronic respiratory tract infections.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Bacteria / metabolism
  • Bacterial Infections / drug therapy
  • Body Temperature
  • Cefmenoxime / analogs & derivatives*
  • Cefmenoxime / therapeutic use*
  • Cephalosporins / therapeutic use*
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Microbial Sensitivity Tests
  • Middle Aged
  • Models, Chemical
  • Placebos
  • Respiratory Tract Infections / drug therapy*
  • Time Factors

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
  • Cephalosporins
  • Placebos
  • cefteram pivoxil
  • cefcapene pivoxil hydrochloride
  • Cefmenoxime