Assessment of motor and process skills reflects brain-injured patients' ability to resume independent living better than neuropsychological tests

Acta Neurol Scand. 2005 Jan;111(1):48-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2004.00356.x.

Abstract

Objective: To compare recovery of cognitive functions and activities of daily living during the first year of rehabilitation after severe brain trauma.

Methods: Sixteen patients were evaluated by neuropsychological tests and occupational performance (assessment of motor and process skills, AMPS) on admission to the rehabilitation centre and 3, 6 and 12 months later.

Results: Cognitive functions improved continuously. Motor skills recovered rapidly and were relatively stable after 3 months. For process skills recovery was protracted. Six of 15 patients were still below the cut-off level after 12 months. Eleven of 13 patients deteriorated regarding process skills after leaving the rehabilitation centre.

Conclusion: AMPS gives a different view of the patient's restitution than neuropsychological tests and may be a better indicator of the patients' ability to resume independent living. The deterioration of process skills post-rehabilitation suggests that lasting contact in an outpatient setting might facilitate return to social life.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Activities of Daily Living*
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Brain Injuries / diagnosis*
  • Brain Injuries / physiopathology
  • Brain Injuries / rehabilitation*
  • Cognition
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Motor Skills*
  • Neuropsychological Tests*
  • Social Behavior