Monitoring the impact of Bt maize on butterflies in the field: estimation of required sample sizes
- PMID: 15612355
- DOI: 10.1051/ebr:2003018
Monitoring the impact of Bt maize on butterflies in the field: estimation of required sample sizes
Abstract
The monitoring of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) after deliberate release is important in order to assess and evaluate possible environmental effects. Concerns have been raised that the transgenic crop, Bt maize, may affect butterflies occurring in field margins. Therefore, a monitoring of butterflies was suggested accompanying the commercial cultivation of Bt maize. In this study, baseline data on the butterfly species and their abundance in maize field margins is presented together with implications for butterfly monitoring. The study was conducted in Bavaria, South Germany, between 2000-2002. A total of 33 butterfly species was recorded in field margins. A small number of species dominated the community, and butterflies observed were mostly common species. Observation duration was the most important factor influencing the monitoring results. Field margin size affected the butterfly abundance, and habitat diversity had a tendency to influence species richness. Sample size and statistical power analyses indicated that a sample size in the range of 75 to 150 field margins for treatment (transgenic maize) and control (conventional maize) would detect (power of 80%) effects larger than 15% in species richness and the butterfly abundance pooled across species. However, a much higher number of field margins must be sampled in order to achieve a higher statistical power, to detect smaller effects, and to monitor single butterfly species.
Similar articles
-
Effect of Bt-176 maize pollen on first instar larvae of the Peacock butterfly (Inachis io) (Lepidoptera; Nymphalidae).Environ Biosafety Res. 2010 Jan-Mar;9(1):5-12. doi: 10.1051/ebr/2010006. Epub 2010 Oct 28. Environ Biosafety Res. 2010. PMID: 21122482
-
Environmental risk assessment for the small tortoiseshell Aglais urticae and a stacked Bt-maize with combined resistances against Lepidoptera and Chrysomelidae in central European agrarian landscapes.Mol Ecol. 2012 Sep;21(18):4646-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05716.x. Epub 2012 Jul 31. Mol Ecol. 2012. PMID: 22861488
-
Occurrence and field densities of Coleoptera in the maize herb layer: implications for Environmental Risk Assessment of genetically modified Bt-maize.Transgenic Res. 2010 Oct;19(5):727-44. doi: 10.1007/s11248-009-9351-3. Epub 2009 Dec 12. Transgenic Res. 2010. PMID: 20012775
-
An ecological risk assessment of Cry1F maize pollen impact to pale grass blue butterfly.Environ Biosafety Res. 2005 Oct-Dec;4(4):243-51. doi: 10.1051/ebr:2006005. Epub 2006 Jun 22. Environ Biosafety Res. 2005. PMID: 16827552
-
Between myth and reality: genetically modified maize, an example of a sizeable scientific controversy.Biochimie. 2002 Nov;84(11):1095-103. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9084(02)00014-7. Biochimie. 2002. PMID: 12595137 Review.
Cited by
-
Limits of Concern: suggestions for the operationalisation of a concept to determine the relevance of adverse effects in the ERA of GMOs.Environ Sci Eur. 2018;30(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12302-018-0169-6. Epub 2018 Oct 25. Environ Sci Eur. 2018. PMID: 30416927 Free PMC article.
-
Are Limits of Concern a useful concept to improve the environmental risk assessment of GM plants?Environ Sci Eur. 2017;29(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12302-017-0104-2. Epub 2017 Feb 16. Environ Sci Eur. 2017. PMID: 28261537 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources