A sural veno-neuro-fasciocutaneous flap in the New Zealand White rabbit was developed, and the role of the large subcutaneous lesser saphenous vein was investigated in proximally based versus distally based flaps. Retrograde dye injection showed that the lesser saphenous vein in rabbits has many valves with strong resistance against reflux. Twenty rabbits were randomly allocated into four groups of 10 flaps each. Group I consisted of proximally based flaps with the lesser saphenous vein intact (outflow) in the veno-neuro-adipofascial pedicle. Group II also consisted of proximally based flaps but the lesser saphenous vein was ligated at 1 cm proximal to the pedicle. Group III consisted of distally based flaps with the lesser saphenous vein intact (inflow) in the veno-neuro-adipofascial pedicle. Group IV also consisted of distally based flaps, but the lesser saphenous vein was ligated at 1 cm distal to the pedicle. The results showed that the mean flap survival area in group I (88.8 percent) was statistically higher than that in group II (62.6 percent, p < 0.001), and was higher in group IV (55.5 percent) than in group III (22.7 percent, p < 0.01). However, group II and group IV had no significant difference (p > 0.05). This experiment demonstrated that flap viability is determined by its intrinsic vascularization, both arterial and venous. The large superficial subcutaneous vein has a positive role (venous outflow) in proximally based flaps but a negative role (venous inflow) in distally based flaps. If the effect of the large subcutaneous vein is excluded, distally based flaps are not inherently inferior to proximally based flaps.