Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Jan;113(1):73-82.
doi: 10.1289/ehp.7186.

Health-related benefits of attaining the 8-hr ozone standard

Affiliations

Health-related benefits of attaining the 8-hr ozone standard

Bryan J Hubbell et al. Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Jan.

Abstract

During the 2000-2002 time period, between 36 and 56% of ozone monitors each year in the United States failed to meet the current ozone standard of 80 ppb for the fourth highest maximum 8-hr ozone concentration. We estimated the health benefits of attaining the ozone standard at these monitors using the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program. We used health impact functions based on published epidemiologic studies, and valuation functions derived from the economics literature. The estimated health benefits for 2000 and 2001 are similar in magnitude, whereas the results for 2002 are roughly twice that of each of the prior 2 years. The simple average of health impacts across the 3 years includes reductions of 800 premature deaths, 4,500 hospital and emergency department admissions, 900,000 school absences, and > 1 million minor restricted activity days. The simple average of benefits (including premature mortality) across the 3 years is 5.7 billion dollars [90% confidence interval (CI), 0.6-15.0] for the quadratic rollback simulation method and 4.9 billion dollars (90% CI, 0.5-14.0) for the proportional rollback simulation method. Results are sensitive to the form of the standard and to assumptions about background ozone levels. If the form of the standard is based on the first highest maximum 8-hr concentration, impacts are increased by a factor of 2-3. Increasing the assumed hourly background from zero to 40 ppb reduced impacts by 30 and 60% for the proportional and quadratic attainment simulation methods, respectively.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adams PF, Hendershot GE, Marano MA. Current estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, 1996. Vital Health Stat. 1999;10(200):1–212. - PubMed
    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 2000. HCUPnet, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Available: http://www.ahrq.gov/HCUPnet/ [accessed 29 September 2004].
    1. Anderson HR, Atkinson RW, Peacock JL, Marston L, Konstantinou K. 2004. Meta-analysis of Time-Series Studies and Panel Studies of Particulate Matter (PM) and Ozone (O3): Report of a WHO Task Group. Copenhagen:World Health Organization.
    1. Bell ML, McDermott A, Zeger SL, Samet JM, Dominici F. Ozone and short-term mortality in 95 U.S. urban communities, 1987–2000. JAMA. 2004;292:2372–2378. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berger MC, Blomquist GC, Kenkel D, Tolley GS. Valuing changes in health risks: a comparison of alternative measures. South Econ J. 1987;53:977–984.

MeSH terms