Systematic review: an evaluation of major commercial weight loss programs in the United States
- PMID: 15630109
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-1-200501040-00012
Systematic review: an evaluation of major commercial weight loss programs in the United States
Abstract
Background: Each year millions of Americans enroll in commercial and self-help weight loss programs. Health care providers and their obese patients know little about these programs because of the absence of systematic reviews.
Purpose: To describe the components, costs, and efficacy of the major commercial and organized self-help weight loss programs in the United States that provide structured in-person or online counseling.
Data sources: Review of company Web sites, telephone discussion with company representatives, and search of the MEDLINE database.
Study selection: Randomized trials at least 12 weeks in duration that enrolled only adults and assessed interventions as they are usually provided to the public, or case series that met these criteria, stated the number of enrollees, and included a follow-up evaluation that lasted 1 year or longer.
Data extraction: Data were extracted on study design, attrition, weight loss, duration of follow-up, and maintenance of weight loss.
Data synthesis: We found studies of eDiets.com, Health Management Resources, Take Off Pounds Sensibly, OPTIFAST, and Weight Watchers. Of 3 randomized, controlled trials of Weight Watchers, the largest reported a loss of 3.2% of initial weight at 2 years. One randomized trial and several case series of medically supervised very-low-calorie diet programs found that patients who completed treatment lost approximately 15% to 25% of initial weight. These programs were associated with high costs, high attrition rates, and a high probability of regaining 50% or more of lost weight in 1 to 2 years. Commercial interventions available over the Internet and organized self-help programs produced minimal weight loss.
Limitations: Because many studies did not control for high attrition rates, the reported results are probably a best-case scenario.
Conclusions: With the exception of 1 trial of Weight Watchers, the evidence to support the use of the major commercial and self-help weight loss programs is suboptimal. Controlled trials are needed to assess the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of these interventions.
Comment in
-
Commercial weight loss programs.Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 1):1023-4; author reply 1024-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-12_part_1-200506210-00017. Ann Intern Med. 2005. PMID: 15968020 No abstract available.
-
Review: little evidence supports the efficacy of major commercial and organized self-help weight loss programs.ACP J Club. 2005 Jul-Aug;143(1):15. ACP J Club. 2005. PMID: 15989303 No abstract available.
-
Review: little evidence supports the efficacy of major commercial and organised self help weight loss programmes.Evid Based Nurs. 2005 Jul;8(3):77. doi: 10.1136/ebn.8.3.77. Evid Based Nurs. 2005. PMID: 16021706 No abstract available.
-
There is insufficient evidence about the efficacy of commercial weight loss programmes. Commentary.Evid Based Cardiovasc Med. 2005 Jun;9(2):142-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ebcm.2005.04.002. Evid Based Cardiovasc Med. 2005. PMID: 16380014 No abstract available.
Summary for patients in
-
Summaries for patients. Evaluation of the major commercial weight loss programs.Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jan 4;142(1):I42. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-1-200501040-00005. Ann Intern Med. 2005. PMID: 15630103 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Summaries for patients. Evaluation of the major commercial weight loss programs.Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jan 4;142(1):I42. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-1-200501040-00005. Ann Intern Med. 2005. PMID: 15630103 No abstract available.
-
Efficacy of commercial weight-loss programs: an updated systematic review.Ann Intern Med. 2015 Apr 7;162(7):501-12. doi: 10.7326/M14-2238. Ann Intern Med. 2015. PMID: 25844997 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Industry-sponsored weight loss programs: description, cost, and effectiveness.J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2004 May;16(5):198-205. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2004.tb00442.x. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2004. PMID: 15193022
-
Weight loss on the web: A pilot study comparing a structured behavioral intervention to a commercial program.Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007 Jan;15(1):155-64. doi: 10.1038/oby.2007.520. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007. PMID: 17228043 Clinical Trial.
-
The cost of losing: an analysis of commercial weight-loss programs in a metropolitan area.J Am Coll Nutr. 1992 Feb;11(1):36-41. doi: 10.1080/07315724.1992.10718194. J Am Coll Nutr. 1992. PMID: 1541793 Review.
Cited by
-
Motivators and Barriers to Joining a Lifestyle Change Program for Disease Prevention.Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2024 Sep 6;5(1):624-631. doi: 10.1089/whr.2024.0093. eCollection 2024. Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2024. PMID: 39391787
-
Weight loss outcomes are generally worse for dogs and cats with class II obesity, defined as > 40% overweight.Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 27;13(1):22958. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50197-y. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 38151525 Free PMC article.
-
Nutrition and physical activity: An Obesity Medicine Association (OMA) Clinical Practice Statement 2022.Obes Pillars. 2022 Jan 10;1:100005. doi: 10.1016/j.obpill.2021.100005. eCollection 2022 Mar. Obes Pillars. 2022. PMID: 38085928 Free PMC article.
-
Use and continuity of weight-modifying medications among adults with diabetes and overweight/obesity: US population study.Obesity (Silver Spring). 2023 Dec;31(12):2924-2935. doi: 10.1002/oby.23869. Epub 2023 Nov 2. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2023. PMID: 37919239
-
Examining Relationships between Cognitive Flexibility, Exercise Perceptions, and Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors.Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2023 Oct 17;13(10):2276-2289. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe13100161. Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2023. PMID: 37887162 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous