This review deals with F responses, which are late responses obtained by supramaximal stimulation of virtually all the motor and mixed peripheral nerves. They are recorded over a muscle innervated by the stimulated nerve. The first description of F-waves was published in the fifties. Their neurophysiological mechanisms have been abundantly discussed in the literature leading to a current consensus, whereby F-waves are considered as antidromic responses produced by a pool of motoneurons activated by peripheral nerve stimulation. In the first part of this review, the neurophysiological mechanisms of F-waves as well as the distinction between these and H reflexes are described from a historical point of view. Other late responses are intentionally not reported; nevertheless A-waves are discussed since they are frequently ill-described in a number of conditions. Stimulation and recording procedures as well as F-wave parameters analysis are detailed, with emphasis on measures most useful for clinical purposes. A rigorous F-wave recording method is mandatory for reliable and meaningful analyses. Physiological factors, which influence F-waves such as ageing, drugs and sleep, must be known and their effects discussed. Also, as maturation is an important factor in clinical neurophysiology, data on F-wave ontogenesis are reviewed and discussed. Finally, the different F-wave alterations described so far in the literature, in either peripheral or central disorders, are listed and commented. It is emphasised that F-waves are particularly useful for the diagnosis of polyneuropathies at a very early stage and for the diagnosis of proximal nerve lesions. F-wave recording is indeed one of the rare methods in routine examination allowing at the same time the functional assessment of motor fibres on their proximal segment, and contributing to the evaluation of motoneuronal excitability.