Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
- PMID: 15657322
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.293.3.299
Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Abstract
Context: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guidelines recommend target values for compressions, ventilations, and CPR-free intervals allowed for rhythm analysis and defibrillation. There is little information on adherence to these guidelines during advanced cardiac life support in the field.
Objective: To measure the quality of out-of-hospital CPR performed by ambulance personnel, as measured by adherence to CPR guidelines.
Design and setting: Case series of 176 adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated by paramedics and nurse anesthetists in Stockholm, Sweden, London, England, and Akershus, Norway, between March 2002 and October 2003. The defibrillators recorded chest compressions via a sternal pad fitted with an accelerometer and ventilations by changes in thoracic impedance between the defibrillator pads, in addition to standard event and electrocardiographic recordings.
Main outcome measure: Adherence to international guidelines for CPR.
Results: Chest compressions were not given 48% (95% CI, 45%-51%) of the time without spontaneous circulation; this percentage was 38% (95% CI, 36%-41%) when subtracting the time necessary for electrocardiographic analysis and defibrillation. Combining these data with a mean compression rate of 121/min (95% CI, 118-124/min) when compressions were given resulted in a mean compression rate of 64/min (95% CI, 61-67/min). Mean compression depth was 34 mm (95% CI, 33-35 mm), 28% (95% CI, 24%-32%) of the compressions had a depth of 38 mm to 51 mm (guidelines recommendation), and the compression part of the duty cycle was 42% (95% CI, 41%-42%). A mean of 11 (95% CI, 11-12) ventilations were given per minute. Sixty-one patients (35%) had return of spontaneous circulation, and 5 of 6 patients discharged alive from the hospital had normal neurological outcomes.
Conclusions: In this study of CPR during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, chest compressions were not delivered half of the time, and most compressions were too shallow. Electrocardiographic analysis and defibrillation accounted for only small parts of intervals without chest compressions.
Comment in
-
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the real world: when will the guidelines get the message?JAMA. 2005 Jan 19;293(3):363-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.3.363. JAMA. 2005. PMID: 15657330 No abstract available.
-
Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.JAMA. 2005 May 4;293(17):2090; author reply 2090-1. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.17.2090-a. JAMA. 2005. PMID: 15870408 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Quality of out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with real time automated feedback: a prospective interventional study.Resuscitation. 2006 Dec;71(3):283-92. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.05.011. Epub 2006 Oct 27. Resuscitation. 2006. PMID: 17070980 Clinical Trial.
-
Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during in-hospital cardiac arrest.JAMA. 2005 Jan 19;293(3):305-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.3.305. JAMA. 2005. PMID: 15657323
-
Improved neurological outcome with continuous chest compressions compared with 30:2 compressions-to-ventilations cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a realistic swine model of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.Circulation. 2007 Nov 27;116(22):2525-30. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.711820. Epub 2007 Nov 12. Circulation. 2007. PMID: 17998457
-
2017 American Heart Association Focused Update on Pediatric Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: An Update to the American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.Circulation. 2018 Jan 2;137(1):e1-e6. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000540. Epub 2017 Nov 6. Circulation. 2018. PMID: 29114009 Review.
-
Part 5: adult basic life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.Circulation. 2010 Nov 2;122(18 Suppl 3):S685-705. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.970939. Circulation. 2010. PMID: 20956221 Review.
Cited by
-
Complication frequency of mechanical chest compression devices: A single-center, blinded study using retrospective data.Resusc Plus. 2024 Sep 24;20:100786. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100786. eCollection 2024 Dec. Resusc Plus. 2024. PMID: 39386132 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Video-Based Error Correction Learning for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training: Quasi-Experimental Study.JMIR Serious Games. 2024 Oct 3;12:e53577. doi: 10.2196/53577. JMIR Serious Games. 2024. PMID: 39361242 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality among Healthcare Providers: A Randomized Experimental Study of the Italian Resuscitation Council.J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 15;13(18):5476. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185476. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39336963 Free PMC article.
-
Manual mastery vs. mechanized magic: current opinions on manual vs. mechanical chest compressions.Curr Opin Crit Care. 2024 Dec 1;30(6):597-602. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001208. Epub 2024 Sep 9. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2024. PMID: 39258342 Review.
-
Echocardiographic clues of the "atrial pump mechanism" during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Intern Emerg Med. 2024 Sep 6. doi: 10.1007/s11739-024-03762-w. Online ahead of print. Intern Emerg Med. 2024. PMID: 39242469
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
