Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Filters applied. Clear all
. 2004 Dec;34(6):679-89.
doi: 10.1007/s10803-004-5288-9.

Quantification Judgement in High Functioning Autism: Superior or Different?


Quantification Judgement in High Functioning Autism: Superior or Different?

Louise Gagnon et al. J Autism Dev Disord. .


This study examined the hypothesis of superior quantification abilities of persons with high functioning autism (HFA). Fourteen HFA individuals (mean age: 15 years) individually matched with 14 typically developing (TD) participants (gender, chronological age, full-scale IQ) were asked to quantify as accurately and quickly as possible numerosities, represented by the number of squares (2-9) presented in random configurations. In addition, the visual angles of stimuli presentation were manipulated in order to induce a local (large visual angle) and a global (small visual angle) bias on participants' quantification performance (accuracy and naming time). Findings revealed no effect of local and global bias of stimuli presentation in the two groups' performance, and no superior quantification abilities in HFA participants. However, analyses of the naming time slopes for identification by HFA participants of small consecutive numerosities (2-5), suggested their use of counting processes instead of subitizing (or immediate apprehension of numerosities) as in TD participants. Possible explanations for these results are discussed with reference to models of locally-oriented information processing in autism.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 4 articles


    1. J Autism Dev Disord. 1996 Aug;26(4):389-406 - PubMed
    1. Cognition. 1994 Apr-Jun;50(1-3):115-32 - PubMed
    1. Cognition. 1992 Aug;44(1-2):1-42 - PubMed
    1. Psychol Bull. 1999 Jan;125(1):31-46 - PubMed
    1. Brain Cogn. 1993 Nov;23(2):279-309 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources