Effectiveness of beta lactam antibiotics compared with antibiotics active against atypical pathogens in non-severe community acquired pneumonia: meta-analysis
- PMID: 15684024
- PMCID: PMC549658
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38334.591586.82
Effectiveness of beta lactam antibiotics compared with antibiotics active against atypical pathogens in non-severe community acquired pneumonia: meta-analysis
Abstract
Objective: To systematically compare beta lactam antibiotics with antibiotics active against atypical pathogens in the management of community acquired pneumonia.
Data sources: Medline, Embase, Cochrane register of controlled trials, international conference proceedings, drug registration authorities, and pharmaceutical companies. Review methods Double blind randomised controlled monotherapy trials comparing beta lactam antibiotics with antibiotics active against atypical pathogens in adults with community acquired pneumonia. Primary outcome was failure to achieve clinical cure or improvement.
Results: 18 trials totalling 6749 participants were identified, with most patients having mild to moderate community acquired pneumonia. The summary relative risk for treatment failure in all cause community acquired pneumonia showed no advantage of antibiotics active against atypical pathogens over beta lactam antibiotics (0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.87 to 1.07). Subgroup analysis was undertaken in those with a specific diagnosis involving atypical pathogens. We found a significantly lower failure rate in patients with Legionella species who were treated with antibiotics active against atypical pathogens (0.40, 0.19 to 0.85). Equivalence was seen for Mycoplasma pneumoniae (0.60, 0.31 to 1.17) and Chlamydia pneumoniae (2.32, 0.67 to 8.03).
Conclusions: Evidence is lacking that clinical outcomes are improved by using antibiotics active against atypical pathogens in all cause non-severe community acquired pneumonia. Although such antibiotics were superior in the management of patients later shown to have legionella related pneumonia, this pathogen was rarely responsible for pneumonia within the included trials. beta lactam agents should remain the antibiotics of initial choice in adults with non-severe community acquired pneumonia.
Figures
Comment in
-
A step forward in the everyday management of adults with community acquired pneumonia.BMJ. 2005 Feb 26;330(7489):460. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38378.607130.55. Epub 2005 Jan 31. BMJ. 2005. PMID: 15684021 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
β-Lactam monotherapy vs β-lactam-macrolide combination treatment in moderately severe community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized noninferiority trial.JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Dec;174(12):1894-901. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.4887. JAMA Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 25286173 Clinical Trial.
-
Empirical atypical coverage for inpatients with community-acquired pneumonia: systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Arch Intern Med. 2005 Sep 26;165(17):1992-2000. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.17.1992. Arch Intern Med. 2005. PMID: 16186469 Review.
-
Is activity against "atypical" pathogens necessary in the treatment protocols for community-acquired pneumonia? Issues with combination therapy.Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Dec 1;47 Suppl 3:S232-6. doi: 10.1086/591409. Clin Infect Dis. 2008. PMID: 18986295 Review.
-
Fluoroquinolones or macrolides alone versus combined with β-lactams for adults with community-acquired pneumonia: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2015 Sep;46(3):242-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2015.04.010. Epub 2015 Jun 3. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2015. PMID: 26092096 Review.
-
Are new antibiotics better than beta-lactams for non-critical inpatients with community-acquired pneumonia?Medwave. 2016 Aug 5;16 Suppl 3:e6499. doi: 10.5867/medwave.2016.6499. Medwave. 2016. PMID: 27512983 Review. English, Spanish.
Cited by
-
Identifying the Best Initial Oral Antibiotics for Adults with Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Network Meta-Analysis.J Gen Intern Med. 2024 May;39(7):1214-1226. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08674-1. Epub 2024 Feb 15. J Gen Intern Med. 2024. PMID: 38360961
-
Antibiotic Treatment of Pulmonary Infections: An Umbrella Review and Evidence Map.Front Pharmacol. 2021 Oct 19;12:680178. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.680178. eCollection 2021. Front Pharmacol. 2021. PMID: 34737694 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Consumption of tetracyclines, sulphonamides and trimethoprim, and other antibacterials in the community, European Union/European Economic Area, 1997-2017.J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021 Jul 26;76(12 Suppl 2):ii45-ii59. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkab177. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021. PMID: 34312660 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Tratamiento empírico de las infecciones en el adulto.FMC. 2007;14:7-58. doi: 10.1016/S1134-2072(07)71960-6. Epub 2009 Jan 6. FMC. 2007. PMID: 32288493 Free PMC article. Spanish. No abstract available.
-
Early Corticosteroid Therapy for Mycoplasma pneumoniae Pneumonia Irrespective of Used Antibiotics in Children.J Clin Med. 2019 May 22;8(5):726. doi: 10.3390/jcm8050726. J Clin Med. 2019. PMID: 31121867 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Watson DA, Musher DM, Jacobson JW, Verhoef J. A brief history of the pneumococcus in biomedical research: a panoply of scientific discovery. Clin Infect Dis 1993;17: 913-24. - PubMed
-
- Evans GM, Gaisford WF. Treatment of pneumonia with 2-(ρ-aminobenzenesulphonamido) pyridine. Lancet 1938;2: 14-9.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical