Objective: To identify patient history intake questions common to four fields of medicine--allopathic, naturopathic, chiropractic, and Traditional Chinese Medicine for potential development of an Integrative Patient History Intake Tool.
Design: A two-round modified Delphi technique was utilized to generate expert consensus among Oregon healthcare practitioners on the importance of specific patient history intake questions. A panel of faculty members from Oregon Health & Sciences University (OHSU), the National College of Naturopathic Medicine (NCNM), the Oregon College of Oriental Medicine (OCOM), and Western States Chiropractic College (WSCC) identified 321 patient history intake questions, which then were distributed to 106 Oregon healthcare practitioners. The healthcare practitioners were asked to rate the importance of each question through a series of two surveys over the period of 11 weeks. Suggestions for additional intake questions also were invited.
Results: The Delphi process resulted in the original 321 initial questions plus 150 additional suggested questions being reduced to 52 intake questions (11% total similarity) for the potential development of the Integrative Patient History Intake Tool. There was a 63% response rate to SURVEY I, and a 73% response rate for SURVEY II.
Conclusion: The concept of attempting to develop an integrative patient history intake tool is important to improve communication between practitioners of allopathic, naturopathic, chiropractic, and Traditional Chinese Medicine. This study revealed insight into the difficulties faced with such a tool due to the lack of similarity in priorities of questions between these different disciplines. This may also reveal a component of why communication remains difficult between these fields, but should not deter efforts to increase communication in the interest of optimal patient care.