Contrasting mutual sexual selection on homologous signal traits in Drosophila serrata
- PMID: 15729657
- DOI: 10.1086/427271
Contrasting mutual sexual selection on homologous signal traits in Drosophila serrata
Abstract
The nature of male mating preferences, and how they differ from female mating preferences in species with conventional sex roles, has received little attention in sexual selection studies. We estimated the form and strength of sexual selection as a consequence of male and female mating preferences in a laboratory-based population of Drosophila serrata. The differences between sexual selection on male and female signal traits (cuticular hydrocarbons [CHCs]) were evaluated within a formal framework of linear and nonlinear selection gradients. Females tended to exert linear sexual selection on male CHCs, whereas males preferred intermediate female CHC phenotypes leading to convex (stabilizing) selection gradients. Possible mechanisms determining the nonlinear nature of sexual selection on female CHCs are proposed.
Similar articles
-
The diversification of mate preferences by natural and sexual selection.J Evol Biol. 2009 Aug;22(8):1608-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01773.x. Epub 2009 Jun 22. J Evol Biol. 2009. PMID: 19549142
-
The evolution of reproductive character displacement conflicts with how sexual selection operates within a species.Evolution. 2008 May;62(5):1192-203. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00357.x. Epub 2008 Feb 21. Evolution. 2008. PMID: 18298640
-
Stronger convex (stabilizing) selection on homologous sexual display traits in females than in males: a multipopulation comparison in Drosophila serrata.Evolution. 2011 Mar;65(3):893-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01158.x. Epub 2010 Nov 10. Evolution. 2011. PMID: 21361917
-
An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2008 May;83(2):151-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00037.x. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2008. PMID: 18429767 Review.
-
Sexual selection: does condition dependence fail to resolve the 'lek paradox'?Curr Biol. 2007 May 1;17(9):R335-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.03.004. Curr Biol. 2007. PMID: 17470350 Review.
Cited by
-
Constraints on the coevolution of contemporary human males and females.Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Dec 7;279(1748):4836-44. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2024. Epub 2012 Oct 3. Proc Biol Sci. 2012. PMID: 23034705 Free PMC article.
-
Environmental variation and biotic interactions limit adaptation at ecological margins: lessons from rainforest Drosophila and European butterflies.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Apr 11;377(1848):20210017. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0017. Epub 2022 Feb 21. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022. PMID: 35184592 Free PMC article.
-
Testing the Effects of DL-Alpha-Tocopherol Supplementation on Oxidative Damage, Total Antioxidant Protection and the Sex-Specific Responses of Reproductive Effort and Lifespan to Dietary Manipulation in Australian Field Crickets (Teleogryllus commodus).Antioxidants (Basel). 2015 Dec 4;4(4):768-92. doi: 10.3390/antiox4040768. Antioxidants (Basel). 2015. PMID: 26783958 Free PMC article.
-
The evolution of female ornaments and weaponry: social selection, sexual selection and ecological competition.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Aug 19;367(1600):2274-93. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0280. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012. PMID: 22777016 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Divergence of premating behaviors in the closely related species Drosophila subquinaria and D. recens.Ecol Evol. 2013 Feb;3(2):365-74. doi: 10.1002/ece3.477. Epub 2013 Jan 9. Ecol Evol. 2013. PMID: 23467696 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
