Meta-analysis: methods for diagnosing intravascular device-related bloodstream infection
- PMID: 15767623
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-6-200503150-00011
Meta-analysis: methods for diagnosing intravascular device-related bloodstream infection
Erratum in
- Ann Intern Med. 2005 May 3;142(9):803
Abstract
Background: No consensus exists on the best methods for diagnosis of intravascular device (IVD)-related bloodstream infection.
Purpose: To identify the most accurate methods for diagnosis of IVD-related bloodstream infection.
Data sources: 51 English-language studies published from 1966 to 31 July 2004.
Study selection: Studies of diagnostic tests for IVD-related bloodstream infection that described a reference standard and provided sufficient data to calculate sensitivity and specificity.
Data extraction: Study quality, diagnostic tests examined, patient characteristics, prevalence, sensitivity, and specificity.
Data synthesis: Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated for 8 diagnostic methods. Summary measures of accuracy were Q* (the upper leftmost point on the summary receiver-operating characteristic curve) and mean D (a log odds ratio). Subgroup analyses were used to assess heterogeneity. Overall, the most accurate test was paired quantitative blood culture (Q* = 0.94 [95% CI, 0.88 to 1.0]), followed by IVD-drawn quantitative [corrected] blood culture (Q* = 0.89 [CI, 0.79 to 0.99]) and the acridine orange leukocyte cytospin test (Q* = 0.89 [CI, 0.79 to 0.91]). The most accurate catheter segment culture test was quantitative culture (Q* = 0.87 [CI, 0.81 to 0.93]), followed by semi-quantitative culture (Q* = 0.84 [CI, 0.80 to 0.88]). Significant heterogeneity in pooled sensitivity and specificity was observed across all test categories.
Limitations: The limited number of studies of some of the diagnostic methods precludes precise estimates of accuracy.
Conclusions: Paired quantitative blood culture is the most accurate test for diagnosis of IVD-related bloodstream infection. However, most other methods studied showed acceptable sensitivity and specificity (both >0.75) and negative predictive value (>99%). The positive predictive value of all tests increased greatly with high pretest clinical probability. Catheters should not be cultured routinely but rather only if IVD-related bloodstream infection is suspected clinically.
Comment in
-
Review: paired quantitative blood cultures most accurately detect intravascular device-related bloodstream infection.ACP J Club. 2005 Nov-Dec;143(3):77. ACP J Club. 2005. PMID: 16262234 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The use of a rapid in situ test in the detection of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection: a prospective study.JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2003 Mar-Apr;27(2):146-50. doi: 10.1177/0148607103027002146. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2003. PMID: 12665171
-
Rapid diagnosis of catheter-related sepsis using the acridine orange leukocyte cytospin test and an endoluminal brush.JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1996 May-Jun;20(3):215-8. doi: 10.1177/0148607196020003215. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1996. PMID: 8776696
-
[Assessment of diagnostic methods for the catheter-related bloodstream infections in intensive care units].Mikrobiyol Bul. 2011 Jan;45(1):75-85. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2011. PMID: 21341162 Turkish.
-
The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies.Mayo Clin Proc. 2006 Sep;81(9):1159-71. doi: 10.4065/81.9.1159. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006. PMID: 16970212 Review.
-
Identification of central venous catheter-related infections in infants and children.Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005 May;6(3 Suppl):S19-24. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000161575.14769.93. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005. PMID: 15857552 Review.
Cited by
-
Treatment of positive catheter tip culture without bloodstream infections in critically ill patients. A case-cohort study from the OUTCOMEREA network.Intensive Care Med. 2024 Jul;50(7):1108-1118. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07498-1. Epub 2024 Jun 24. Intensive Care Med. 2024. PMID: 38913096 Free PMC article.
-
Practical Guidance for Clinical Microbiology Laboratories: Microbiologic diagnosis of implant-associated infections.Clin Microbiol Rev. 2024 Jun 13;37(2):e0010423. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00104-23. Epub 2024 Mar 20. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2024. PMID: 38506553 Review.
-
Guidelines on vascular access for hemodialysis from the Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery.J Vasc Bras. 2023 Oct 30;22:e20230052. doi: 10.1590/1677-5449.202300522. eCollection 2023. J Vasc Bras. 2023. PMID: 38021275 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Guidelines for Central Venous Port Placement and Management (Abridged Translation of the Japanese Version).Interv Radiol (Higashimatsuyama). 2023 Jul 1;8(2):105-117. doi: 10.22575/interventionalradiology.2022-0015. eCollection 2023 Jul 1. Interv Radiol (Higashimatsuyama). 2023. PMID: 37485481 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pre-Emptive Antimicrobial Locks Decrease Long-Term Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections in Hemodialysis Patients.Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Nov 24;11(12):1692. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11121692. Antibiotics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36551349 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical