Is INR between 2.0 and 3.0 the optimal level for Chinese patients on warfarin therapy for moderate-intensity anticoagulation?

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 May;59(5):582-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2005.02361.x.

Abstract

Aim: To examine the optimal range of International Normalized Ratio (INR) for Chinese patients receiving warfarin for moderate-intensity anticoagulation.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at the ambulatory setting of a 1400-bed public teaching hospital in Hong Kong. The INR measurements and occurrence of serious or life-threatening haemorrhagic and thromboembolic events among patients newly started on warfarin from 1 January 1999 to 30 June 2001 for indications with target INR 2-3 were analysed. The INR-specific incidence of bleeding and thromboembolism were calculated.

Results: A total of 491 patients were included, contributing to 453 patient-years of observation period. Forty-seven of the 491 patients experienced 25 haemorrhagic events (5.5 per 100 patient-years) and 27 thromboembolic events (6.0 per 100 patient-years). The percentage of patient-time spent within therapeutic INR range (2-3), INR <2 and INR >3 were 50, 44 and 6%, respectively. The incidence of either haemorrhagic or thromboembolic events was lowest (< or =4 events per 100 patient-years) at INR values between 1.8 and 2.4.

Conclusions: An INR of 1.8-2.4 appeared to be associated with the lowest incidence rate of major bleeding or thromboembolic events in a cohort of Hong Kong Chinese patients receiving warfarin therapy for moderate-intensity anticoagulation.

MeSH terms

  • Age Distribution
  • Aged
  • Anticoagulants / therapeutic use*
  • Asian People
  • Cohort Studies
  • Hemorrhage / blood*
  • Hemorrhage / etiology
  • Hong Kong
  • Humans
  • International Normalized Ratio*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Thromboembolism / blood*
  • Thromboembolism / etiology
  • Warfarin / therapeutic use*

Substances

  • Anticoagulants
  • Warfarin