Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Erratum in

  • Nat Methods. 2005 Jun;2(6):477

Abstract

To facilitate collaborative research efforts between multi-investigator teams using DNA microarrays, we identified sources of error and data variability between laboratories and across microarray platforms, and methods to accommodate this variability. RNA expression data were generated in seven laboratories, which compared two standard RNA samples using 12 microarray platforms. At least two standard microarray types (one spotted, one commercial) were used by all laboratories. Reproducibility for most platforms within any laboratory was typically good, but reproducibility between platforms and across laboratories was generally poor. Reproducibility between laboratories increased markedly when standardized protocols were implemented for RNA labeling, hybridization, microarray processing, data acquisition and data normalization. Reproducibility was highest when analysis was based on biological themes defined by enriched Gene Ontology (GO) categories. These findings indicate that microarray results can be comparable across multiple laboratories, especially when a common platform and set of procedures are used.

Comment in

  • Of fish and chips.
    Sherlock G. Sherlock G. Nat Methods. 2005 May;2(5):329-30. doi: 10.1038/nmeth0505-329. Nat Methods. 2005. PMID: 15846357 No abstract available.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 165 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback