Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2005 May;192(5):1692-6.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.11.043.

A Randomized Trial of the Effects of Coached vs Uncoached Maternal Pushing During the Second Stage of Labor on Postpartum Pelvic Floor Structure and Function

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A Randomized Trial of the Effects of Coached vs Uncoached Maternal Pushing During the Second Stage of Labor on Postpartum Pelvic Floor Structure and Function

J I Schaffer et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. .

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine if refraining from coached pushing during the second stage of labor affects postpartum urogynecologic measures of pelvic floor structure and function.

Study design: Nulliparous women at term were randomized to coached (n = 67) vs uncoached (n = 61) pushing. At 3 months' postpartum women underwent urodynamic testing, pelvic organ prolapse examination (POPQ), and pelvic floor neuromuscular assessment.

Results: Urodynamic testing revealed decreased bladder capacity (427 mL vs 482 mL, P = .051) and decreased first urge to void (160 mL vs 202 mL, P = .025) in the coached group. Detrusor overactivity increased 2-fold in the coached group (16% vs 8%), although this difference was not statistically significant (P = .17). Urodynamic stress incontinence was diagnosed in the coached group in 11/67 (16%) vs 7/61 (12%) in the uncoached group (P = .42).

Conclusion: Coached pushing in the second stage of labor significantly affected urodynamic indices, and was associated with a trend towards increased detrusor overactivity.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 13 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

Feedback