Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Oct;222(2):372-85.
doi: 10.1007/s00425-005-1540-6. Epub 2005 Jun 2.

Poor Competitive Fitness of Transgenically Mitigated Tobacco in Competition With the Wild Type in a Replacement Series

Affiliations

Poor Competitive Fitness of Transgenically Mitigated Tobacco in Competition With the Wild Type in a Replacement Series

Hani Al-Ahmad et al. Planta. .

Abstract

Transgenic crops can interbreed with other crop cultivars or with related weeds, increasing the potential of the hybrid progeny for competition. To prevent generating competitive hybrids, we previously tested tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) as a model for validating the transgenic mitigation (TM) concept using tandem constructs where a gene of choice is linked to mitigating genes that are positive or neutral to the crop, but deleterious to a recipient under competition. Here, we examine the efficacy of the TM concept at various ratios of transgenically mitigated tobacco in competition with the wild type tobacco in an ecological replacement series. The dwarf/herbicide-resistant TM transgenic plants cultivated alone under self-competition grew well and formed many more flowers than the tall wild type, which is an indication of greater reproductivity. In contrast to the wild type, TM flowering was almost completely suppressed in mixed cultures at most TM/wild type ratios up to 75% transgenic, as the TM plants were extremely unfit to reproduce. In addition, homozygous TM progeny had an even lower competitive fitness against the wild type than hemizygous/homozygous TM segregants. Thus, the TM technology was effective in reducing the risk of transgene establishment of intraspecific transgenic hybrids at different competitive levels, at the close spacing typical of weed populations.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 8 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Nat Biotechnol. 2002 Jun;20(6):581-6 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 May 27;100(11):6855-9 - PubMed
    1. Am J Bot. 1997 Jun;84(6):756 - PubMed
    1. Z Naturforsch C. 2005 Mar-Apr;60(3-4):154-65 - PubMed
    1. Proc Biol Sci. 1996 Dec 22;263(1377):1659-63 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback