Background and aims: As the merits of screening at-risk populations for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain unclear, we compared the clinico-pathologic features and survival of patients with cirrhosis and HCC detected by screening (Group A) to that in non-screened cases (Group B).
Methods: We studied cirrhotics who developed HCC between 1994 and 2002. During this period, cirrhotics managed by the Gastroenterology Unit were regularly screened at 6-12 monthly intervals while those managed by other hospital units were not. Demographic data, tumor details, treatment received and survival were recorded and compared according to screening status.
Results: There were 96 cases identified; 41 by screening (group A) and 55 by non-screening methods (Group B). HCC in Group A were smaller (P < 0.01), more likely unilobar (P < 0.01), at an early stage (P < 0.0005) and before vascular invasion (P < 0.005) than Group B cases. The frequency of hepatic surgery and/or local ablation was higher in Group A than Group B (P = 0.001). Overall median survival of Group A was 882 days versus 99 days in Group B (P < 0.0001). One- and 3-year probabilities of survival in Group A were 89% and 38%, versus 33% and 19% in Group B (P < 0.001). Independent predictors of survival included screening, Child-Pugh score, creatinine, tumor stage and absence of alcohol as the etiology.
Conclusions: Screening for HCC in cirrhosis identifies tumors at an earlier stage, results in a higher chance of receiving curative treatment and possibly improves patient survival. The absence of alcoholic liver disease impacts favorably on survival.
(c) 2005 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.