Do behavioral smoking reduction approaches reach more or different smokers? Two studies; similar answers

Addict Behav. 2006 Mar;31(3):509-18. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.05.039. Epub 2005 Jun 24.

Abstract

There is a need for innovative approaches capable of reaching smokers who would not otherwise participate in efforts to modify their smoking. This paper reports on two studies to determine whether a smoking reduction intervention would appeal to additional or different types of smokers than do cessation interventions. Study 1 attempted to contact 160 HMO smokers scheduled for outpatient surgeries. In Study 2, actual pilot reduction and cessation programs were offered to 531 smokers about to undergo out-patient surgeries or procedures. In Study 1, 39% of those eligible elected smoking reduction; and 38% selected cessation. In Study 2 of those eligible, 22% began participation in the smoking reduction program; 12% preferred a cessation approach; and 65% declined. There were few demographic or smoking history differences among those who elected smoking reduction, cessation, or declined. Among this understudied population, a sizable proportion in both studies agreed to participate in smoking reduction. If replicated, this suggests that comprehensive programs that include a smoking reduction component could substantially increase their reach.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Community Health Services / organization & administration
  • Female
  • Health Behavior
  • Health Promotion
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Motivation
  • Patient Acceptance of Health Care*
  • Smoking Cessation / methods*
  • Smoking Prevention*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires