The legacy of Tuskegee and trust in medical care: is Tuskegee responsible for race differences in mistrust of medical care?

J Natl Med Assoc. 2005 Jul;97(7):951-6.

Abstract

Objectives: To examine race differences in knowledge of the Tuskegee study and the relationship between knowledge of the Tuskegee study and medical system mistrust.

Methods: We conducted a telephone survey of 277 African-American and 101 white adults 18-93 years of age in Baltimore, MD. Participants responded to questions regarding mistrust of medical care, including a series of questions regarding the Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male (Tuskegee study).

Results: Findings show no differences by race in knowledge of or about the Tuskegee study and that knowledge of the study was not a predictor of trust of medical care. However, we find significant race differences in medical care mistrust.

Conclusions: Our results cast doubt on the proposition that the widely documented race difference in mistrust of medical care results from the Tuskegee study. Rather, race differences in mistrust likely stem from broader historical and personal experiences.

Publication types

  • Historical Article
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • African Americans / education
  • African Americans / history
  • African Americans / psychology*
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Alabama
  • Attitude to Health / ethnology*
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Female
  • Health Care Surveys
  • History, 20th Century
  • Human Experimentation / history*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prejudice*
  • Socioeconomic Factors
  • Syphilis / ethnology
  • Syphilis / therapy
  • Trust*
  • United States
  • United States Public Health Service / history