Comparison of ethinylestradiol pharmacokinetics in three hormonal contraceptive formulations: the vaginal ring, the transdermal patch and an oral contraceptive
- PMID: 16102549
- DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2005.03.005
Comparison of ethinylestradiol pharmacokinetics in three hormonal contraceptive formulations: the vaginal ring, the transdermal patch and an oral contraceptive
Abstract
This open-label, randomized study compared the pharmacokinetics of ethinylestradiol (EE) from the contraceptive vaginal ring NuvaRing (15 microg EE/day), the transdermal patch (20 microg EE/day) and a combined oral contraceptive (COC) containing 30 microg EE. After 2-8 weeks of synchronization by COC treatment, subjects were randomized to 21 days of treatment with NuvaRing, patch or COC. Analysis of area under the EE concentration-versus-time curve (AUC) during 21 days of treatment showed that exposure to EE in the NuvaRing group was 3.4 times lower than in the patch group (p < .05) and 2.1 times lower than in the pill group (p < .05). Serum EE levels of subjects showed much lower variation with NuvaRing than with the patch or the COC. Thus, exposure to EE was significantly lower with NuvaRing than with the patch and pill methods, demonstrating that NuvaRing is a low-estrogen-dose contraceptive method that also results in low estrogen exposure.
Similar articles
-
Efficacy and safety of a contraceptive vaginal ring (NuvaRing) compared with a combined oral contraceptive: a 1-year randomized trial.Contraception. 2005 Mar;71(3):176-82. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.09.001. Contraception. 2005. PMID: 15722066 Clinical Trial.
-
Ovarian function with the contraceptive vaginal ring or an oral contraceptive: a randomized study.Hum Reprod. 2004 Nov;19(11):2668-73. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh493. Epub 2004 Aug 27. Hum Reprod. 2004. PMID: 15333593 Clinical Trial.
-
The effects of rifampin and rifabutin on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a combination oral contraceptive.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999 Apr;65(4):428-38. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9236(99)70138-4. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999. PMID: 10223781 Clinical Trial.
-
Complete and robust ovulation inhibition with NuvaRing.Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2002 Dec;7 Suppl 2:13-8; discussion 37-9. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2002. PMID: 12659397 Review.
-
Lower hormone dosage with improved cycle control.Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2002 Dec;7 Suppl 2:25-30; discussion 37-9. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2002. PMID: 12659399 Review.
Cited by
-
Alignment of contraception use with the ACR reproductive health guidelines in women with systemic lupus erythematosus within the RISE registry.Lupus Sci Med. 2024 Aug 24;11(2):e001192. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2024-001192. Lupus Sci Med. 2024. PMID: 39181689 Free PMC article.
-
U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2024.MMWR Recomm Rep. 2024 Aug 8;73(4):1-126. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7304a1. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2024. PMID: 39106314 Free PMC article.
-
Trans-eyelid distribution of epinastine to the conjunctiva following eyelid application in rabbits.Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep;68(5):594-602. doi: 10.1007/s10384-024-01070-6. Epub 2024 May 25. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2024. PMID: 38795193 Free PMC article.
-
The hormonal profile in women using combined monophasic oral contraceptive pills varies across the pill cycle: a temporal analysis of serum endogenous and exogenous hormones using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectroscopy.Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2024 Jul 1;327(1):E121-E133. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00418.2023. Epub 2024 May 22. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2024. PMID: 38775726
-
Comparison of Combined Parenteral and Oral Hormonal Contraceptives: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 19;13(2):575. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020575. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38276081 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
