Outcome and survival of patients aged 65 years and younger after abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture

World J Surg. 2005 Oct;29(10):1245-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-7799-8.

Abstract

Advanced age (> 80 years) confers a survival disadvantage after operative repair of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). This study aimed to determine if young age (< or =65 years) confers a survival benefit. Consecutive patients undergoing attempted repair of a ruptured AAA between 1995 and 2001 were included in the study. Demographic, clinical, and operative factors were analyzed together with in-hospital mortality, duration of postoperative hospital stay, and long-term survival. Of 378 patients admitted with a ruptured AAA, 52 (14%) were < or = 65 years of age and 326 (86%) were > 65 years. There were 4 (8%) women in the younger cohort compared to 74 (23%) women in the older group (p = 0.015). Four (8%) patients in the younger group were thought to be unsuitable for surgical repair compared to 77 (24%) patients in the older cohort (p = 0.009). Of the 48 younger patients who underwent attempted operative repair, 22 (46%) died in hospital, compared to 108 (43%) of 249 patients > 65 years (p = 0.753). The median (range) postoperative hospital stay of survivors was 11 days (6-59 days) in the younger cohort and 15 days (6-121 days) in the older group (p = 0.005). Patients < or = 65 years of age undergoing operative repair of ruptured AAA have no survival advantage over older patients. These data support AAA screening for the "at risk" and age-defined population.

MeSH terms

  • Age Factors
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / mortality*
  • Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / surgery
  • Aortic Rupture / mortality*
  • Aortic Rupture / surgery
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation / mortality
  • Cohort Studies
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Scotland / epidemiology
  • Survival Analysis
  • Treatment Outcome