The genetic architecture of sucrose responsiveness in the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.)
- PMID: 16172502
- PMCID: PMC1456151
- DOI: 10.1534/genetics.105.046490
The genetic architecture of sucrose responsiveness in the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.)
Abstract
One of the best examples of a natural behavioral syndrome is the pollen-hoarding syndrome in honeybees that ties together multiple behavioral phenotypes, ranging from foraging behavior to behavioral ontogeny and learning performance. A central behavioral factor is the bees' responsiveness to sucrose, measured as their proboscis extension reflex. This study examines the genetics of this trait in diploid worker and haploid male honeybees (drones) to learn more about the genetic architecture of the overall behavioral syndrome, using original strains selected for pollen-hoarding behavior. We show that a significant proportion of the phenotypic variability is determined by genotype in males and workers. Second, our data present overwhelming evidence for pleiotropic effects of previously identified quantitative trait loci for foraging behavior (pln-QTL) and epistatic interactions among them. Furthermore, we report on three genomic QTL scans (two reciprocal worker backcrosses and one drone hybrid population) derived from our selection strains. We present at least one significant and two putative new QTL directly affecting the sucrose response of honeybees. Thus, this study demonstrates the modular genetic architecture of behavioral syndromes in general, and elucidates the genetic architecture of the pollen-hoarding behavioral syndrome in particular. Understanding this behavioral syndrome is important for understanding the division of labor in social insects and social evolution itself.
Figures
) Low (n = 96), (
) LBC (n = 258), (
) HBC (n = 265), (□) high (n = 93). (B) (
) Low (n = 81), (
) hybrid (n = 158), (□) high (n = 34).
) Low (n = 96), (
) LBC (n = 258), (
) HBC (n = 265), (□) high (n = 93). (B) (
) Low (n = 81), (
) hybrid (n = 158), (□) high (n = 34).
Similar articles
-
Societies to genes: can we get there from here?Genetics. 2021 Aug 26;219(1):iyab104. doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyab104. Genetics. 2021. PMID: 34849914 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Locomotion and the pollen hoarding behavioral syndrome of the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.).J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2005 Jul;191(7):669-74. doi: 10.1007/s00359-005-0624-x. Epub 2005 Apr 12. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2005. PMID: 15824930 Free PMC article.
-
The effects of foraging role and genotype on light and sucrose responsiveness in honey bees (Apis mellifera L.).Behav Brain Res. 2009 Dec 14;205(1):132-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.07.022. Epub 2009 Jul 28. Behav Brain Res. 2009. PMID: 19643145
-
The genetic architecture of the behavioral ontogeny of foraging in honeybee workers.Genetics. 2004 Aug;167(4):1767-79. doi: 10.1534/genetics.103.021949. Genetics. 2004. PMID: 15342515 Free PMC article.
-
8. The development and evolution of division of labor and foraging specialization in a social insect (Apis mellifera L.).Curr Top Dev Biol. 2006;74:253-86. doi: 10.1016/S0070-2153(06)74008-X. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2006. PMID: 16860670 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Pleiotropy of segregating genetic variants that affect honey bee worker life expectancy.Exp Gerontol. 2012 Aug;47(8):631-7. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2012.05.017. Epub 2012 Jun 1. Exp Gerontol. 2012. PMID: 22664574 Free PMC article.
-
A Multiscale Review of Behavioral Variation in Collective Foraging Behavior in Honey Bees.Insects. 2019 Oct 25;10(11):370. doi: 10.3390/insects10110370. Insects. 2019. PMID: 31731405 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Societies to genes: can we get there from here?Genetics. 2021 Aug 26;219(1):iyab104. doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyab104. Genetics. 2021. PMID: 34849914 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Tyramine and its Amtyr1 receptor modulate attention in honey bees (Apis mellifera).Elife. 2023 Oct 10;12:e83348. doi: 10.7554/eLife.83348. Elife. 2023. PMID: 37814951 Free PMC article.
-
PDK1 and HR46 gene homologs tie social behavior to ovary signals.PLoS One. 2009;4(4):e4899. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004899. Epub 2009 Apr 2. PLoS One. 2009. PMID: 19340296 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Anholt, R. R. H., 2004. Genetic modules and networks for behavior: lessons from Drosophila. BioEssays 26: 1299–1306. - PubMed
-
- Antoni, F. A., 2000. Molecular diversity of cyclic AMP signaling. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 21: 103–132. - PubMed
-
- Barron, A. B., D. J. Schulz and G. E. Robinson, 2002. Octopamine modulates responsiveness to foraging-related stimuli in honey bees (Apis mellifera). J. Comp. Physiol. A 188: 603–610. - PubMed
-
- Basten, C. J., B. S. Weir and Z-B. Zeng, 1994. Zmap-a QTL cartographer, pp. 56–66 in Proceedings of the 5th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production: Computing Strategies and Software, Vol. 22, edited by C. Smith, J. S. Gavora, B. Benkel, J. Chesnais, W. Fairfull, J. P. Gibson, B. W. Kennedy and E. B. Burnside. Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
