The leading eight: social norms that can maintain cooperation by indirect reciprocity
- PMID: 16174521
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.08.008
The leading eight: social norms that can maintain cooperation by indirect reciprocity
Abstract
The theory of indirect reciprocation explains the evolution of cooperation among unrelated individuals, engaging in one-shot interaction. Using reputation, a player acquires information on who are worth cooperating and who are not. In a previous paper, we formalized the reputation dynamics, a rule to assign a binary reputation (good or bad) to each player when his action, his current reputation, and the opponent's reputation are given. We then examined all the possible reputation dynamics, and found that there exist only eight reputation dynamics named "leading eight" that can maintain the ESS with a high level of cooperation, even if errors are included in executing intended cooperation and in reporting the observation to the public. In this paper, we study the nature of these successful social norms. First, we characterize the role of each pivot of the reputation dynamics common to all of the leading eight. We conclude that keys to the success in indirect reciprocity are to be nice (maintenance of cooperation among themselves), retaliatory (detection of defectors, punishment, and justification of punishment), apologetic, and forgiving. Second, we prove the two basic properties of the leading eight, which give a quantitative evaluation of the ESS condition and the level of cooperation maintained at the ESS.
Similar articles
-
Global analyses of evolutionary dynamics and exhaustive search for social norms that maintain cooperation by reputation.J Theor Biol. 2007 Feb 7;244(3):518-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.08.018. Epub 2006 Sep 1. J Theor Biol. 2007. PMID: 17030041
-
How should we define goodness?--reputation dynamics in indirect reciprocity.J Theor Biol. 2004 Nov 7;231(1):107-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.06.005. J Theor Biol. 2004. PMID: 15363933
-
Three-person game facilitates indirect reciprocity under image scoring.J Theor Biol. 2007 Nov 7;249(1):93-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.07.017. Epub 2007 Jul 24. J Theor Biol. 2007. PMID: 17714735
-
The complexity of human cooperation under indirect reciprocity.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200291. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0291. Epub 2021 Oct 4. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021. PMID: 34601904 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Punishment in animal societies.Nature. 1995 Jan 19;373(6511):209-16. doi: 10.1038/373209a0. Nature. 1995. PMID: 7816134 Review.
Cited by
-
The robustness of reciprocity: Experimental evidence that each form of reciprocity is robust to the presence of other forms of reciprocity.Sci Adv. 2020 Jun 3;6(23):eaba0504. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba0504. eCollection 2020 Jun. Sci Adv. 2020. PMID: 32537500 Free PMC article.
-
Groupwise information sharing promotes ingroup favoritism in indirect reciprocity.BMC Evol Biol. 2012 Nov 5;12:213. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-213. BMC Evol Biol. 2012. PMID: 23126611 Free PMC article.
-
The effects of reputational and social knowledge on cooperation.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Mar 24;112(12):3647-52. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1415883112. Epub 2015 Mar 9. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015. PMID: 25775544 Free PMC article.
-
Inferring reputation promotes the evolution of cooperation in spatial social dilemma games.PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40218. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040218. Epub 2012 Jul 9. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22808120 Free PMC article.
-
The rise and fall of cooperation through reputation and group polarization.Nat Commun. 2019 Feb 15;10(1):776. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08727-8. Nat Commun. 2019. PMID: 30770812 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
