Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Sep;60(3):123-8.
doi: 10.1007/s11130-005-6840-2.

Almond (Prunus Dulcis L.) Protein Quality

Affiliations

Almond (Prunus Dulcis L.) Protein Quality

Susan Ahrens et al. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. .

Abstract

Three marketing varieties of almonds; Carmel, Mission, and Nonpareil; were analyzed for proximate composition and protein nutritive quality. Moisture, lipids, protein, ash, sugars, and tannins ranges were 3.05-4.33%, 43.37-47.50%, 20.68-23.30%, 3.74-4.56%, 5.35-7.45%, and 0.12-0.18%, respectively. No detectable hemagglutinating and trypsin inhibitory activities were present in Carmel, Mission, and Nonpareil almonds. Amino acid analyses indicated the sulfur amino acids (methionine + cysteine), lysine, and threonine to be the first, second, and third limiting amino acids in almonds when compared to the recommended amino acid pattern for children 2-5-year old. However, compared to the recommended amino acid pattern for adults, sulfur amino acids were the only limiting amino acids in almonds tested. True Protein Digestibility (% TPD) values for Carmel, Mission, and Nonpareil were 88.55 +/- 1.26, 92.25 +/- 1.05, and 82.62 +/- 1.47, respectively. Protein Digestibility Corrected Amino Acid Scoring (PDCAAS) values suggested almond proteins to be of poor nutritional quality.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 13 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Plant Mol Biol. 1995 Jan;27(1):205-10 - PubMed
    1. J Agric Food Chem. 2002 Jun 5;50(12):3544-8 - PubMed
    1. Z Lebensm Unters Forsch. 1982;175(1):34-7 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Bot. 2003 Mar;54(384):913-22 - PubMed
    1. J Agric Food Chem. 2001 Apr;49(4):2043-52 - PubMed

Publication types

Feedback