Methane mass balance at three landfill sites: what is the efficiency of capture by gas collection systems?
- PMID: 16198554
- DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2005.07.021
Methane mass balance at three landfill sites: what is the efficiency of capture by gas collection systems?
Abstract
Many developed countries have targeted landfill methane recovery among greenhouse gas mitigation strategies, since methane is the second most important greenhouse gas after carbon dioxide. Major questions remain with respect to actual methane production rates in field settings and the relative mass of methane that is recovered, emitted, oxidized by methanotrophic bacteria, laterally migrated, or temporarily stored within the landfill volume. This paper presents the results of extensive field campaigns at three landfill sites to elucidate the total methane balance and provide field measurements to quantify these pathways. We assessed the overall methane mass balance in field cells with a variety of designs, cover materials, and gas management strategies. Sites included different cell configurations, including temporary clay cover, final clay cover, geosynthetic clay liners, and geomembrane composite covers, and cells with and without gas collection systems. Methane emission rates ranged from -2.2 to >10,000 mg CH(4) m(-2) d(-1). Total methane oxidation rates ranged from 4% to 50% of the methane flux through the cover at sites with positive emissions. Oxidation of atmospheric methane was occurring in vegetated soils above a geomembrane. The results of these studies were used as the basis for guidelines by the French environment agency (ADEME) for default values for percent recovery: 35% for an operating cell with an active landfill gas (LFG) recovery system, 65% for a temporary covered cell with an active LFG recovery system, 85% for a cell with clay final cover and active LFG recovery, and 90% for a cell with a geomembrane final cover and active LFG recovery.
Similar articles
-
Methane flux and oxidation at two types of intermediate landfill covers.Waste Manag. 2006;26(11):1305-12. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2005.11.016. Epub 2006 Jan 19. Waste Manag. 2006. PMID: 16426833
-
Assessment of the methane oxidation capacity of compacted soils intended for use as landfill cover materials.Waste Manag. 2011 May;31(5):833-42. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.10.006. Epub 2010 Nov 9. Waste Manag. 2011. PMID: 21067907
-
Mitigation of methane emission from Fakse landfill using a biowindow system.Waste Manag. 2011 May;31(5):1018-28. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.01.024. Epub 2011 Feb 22. Waste Manag. 2011. PMID: 21345663
-
Microbial methane oxidation processes and technologies for mitigation of landfill gas emissions.Waste Manag Res. 2009 Aug;27(5):409-55. doi: 10.1177/0734242X09339325. Epub 2009 Jul 7. Waste Manag Res. 2009. PMID: 19584243 Review.
-
Biotic systems to mitigate landfill methane emissions.Waste Manag Res. 2008 Feb;26(1):33-46. doi: 10.1177/0734242X07087977. Waste Manag Res. 2008. PMID: 18338700 Review.
Cited by
-
A Review of Landfill Microbiology and Ecology: A Call for Modernization With 'Next Generation' Technology.Front Microbiol. 2020 Jun 3;11:1127. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01127. eCollection 2020. Front Microbiol. 2020. PMID: 32582086 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Estimation of methane gas by LandGEM model from Yasuj municipal solid waste landfill, Iran.MethodsX. 2019 Feb 15;6:391-398. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2019.02.013. eCollection 2019. MethodsX. 2019. PMID: 30906697 Free PMC article.
-
Ecological risk assessment of an open dumping site at Mehmood Booti Lahore, Pakistan.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Jul;24(21):17889-17899. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-9215-y. Epub 2017 Jun 15. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017. PMID: 28616741
-
Alternative carbon dioxide modelling approaches accounting for high residual gases in LandGEM.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Jun;24(16):14322-14336. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-8990-9. Epub 2017 Apr 20. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017. PMID: 28429269
-
Assessment of methane generation, oxidation, and emission in a subtropical landfill test cell.Environ Monit Assess. 2016 Aug;188(8):464. doi: 10.1007/s10661-016-5460-7. Epub 2016 Jul 12. Environ Monit Assess. 2016. PMID: 27406209
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
