Explaining the poor bacteriologic eradication rate of single-dose ceftriaxone in group a streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis: a reverse engineering solution using pharmacodynamic modeling
- PMID: 16199703
- DOI: 10.1542/peds.2004-2294
Explaining the poor bacteriologic eradication rate of single-dose ceftriaxone in group a streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis: a reverse engineering solution using pharmacodynamic modeling
Abstract
Objective: To explore pharmacokinetic factors underlying the poor bacteriologic eradication rate with a single 500-mg dose of ceftriaxone for streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis and to identify the minimum ceftriaxone dose required for effective treatment.
Methods: Population modeling techniques were applied to pharmacokinetic data derived from paired plasma and tonsil samples from 153 children to assess the contribution of pharmacokinetic variability to patients' responses to ceftriaxone. In addition, a Monte Carlo simulation was performed to determine (1) the amount of time that free ceftriaxone concentrations must exceed the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of group A Streptococcus to achieve bacteriologic eradication and (2) the ceftriaxone dose required to maintain free drug concentrations above the target MIC for the requisite amount of time. Ceftriaxone MICs for group A Streptococcus were obtained from a previous trial, in which all MICs (n = 115) were < or = 0.064 mg/L; 33.9% were susceptible at < or = 0.016 mg/L, 66.4% were susceptible at 0.032 mg/L, and 1.7% were susceptible at 0.064 mg/L.
Results: Mean population pharmacokinetic parameters and their variances reflected substantial variability of clearance and half-life in the target population. Tonsillar ceftriaxone protein binding was 89.1%. The proportions of 1000 simulated patients with free ceftriaxone concentrations that exceeded MICs of 0.016 mg/L, 0.032 mg/L, and 0.064 mg/L at 24 hours were 71.7%, 65.4%, and 57.2%, respectively, and at 48 hours were 41.8%, 35.8%, and 28.6%, respectively. The amount of time that free ceftriaxone concentrations need to exceed MIC to achieve bacteriologic success was estimated to be 36 hours. Using this time criterion, two 500-mg doses of ceftriaxone separated by 18 hours should achieve a bacteriologic cure rate of approximately 95%.
Conclusions: Pharmacokinetic variability and high ceftriaxone tonsillar protein binding explain the high microbiologic failure rate for a single 500-mg dose of ceftriaxone in group A streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis. Monte Carlo simulation suggests that a second dose administered 18 hours after the first will be required to achieve an acceptable bacteriologic cure rate.
Similar articles
-
Oral clindamycin 300 mg BID compared with oral amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 1 g BID in the outpatient treatment of acute recurrent pharyngotonsillitis caused by group a beta-hemolytic streptococci: an international, multicenter, randomized, investigator-blinded, prospective trial in patients between the ages of 12 and 60 years.Clin Ther. 2006 Jan;28(1):99-109. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.01.006. Clin Ther. 2006. PMID: 16490583 Clinical Trial.
-
Pharmacodynamic analysis and clinical trial of amoxicillin sprinkle administered once daily for 7 days compared to penicillin V potassium administered four times daily for 10 days in the treatment of tonsillopharyngitis due to Streptococcus pyogenes in children.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008 Jul;52(7):2512-20. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00132-07. Epub 2008 Mar 10. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008. PMID: 18332170 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Higher dosages of azithromycin are more effective in treatment of group A streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis.Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Jun 15;40(12):1748-55. doi: 10.1086/430307. Epub 2005 May 13. Clin Infect Dis. 2005. PMID: 15909262
-
Defining the optimum treatment regimen for azithromycin in acute tonsillopharyngitis.Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2004 Feb;23(2 Suppl):S129-34. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000112527.33870.0d. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2004. PMID: 14770076 Review.
-
Group A streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis: cost-effective diagnosis and treatment.Ann Emerg Med. 1995 Mar;25(3):390-403. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70300-4. Ann Emerg Med. 1995. PMID: 7864482 Review.
Cited by
-
Managing treatment failure in Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection: current guidelines and future directions.Lancet Infect Dis. 2024 Aug;24(8):e532-e538. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(24)00001-X. Epub 2024 Feb 14. Lancet Infect Dis. 2024. PMID: 38367636 Free PMC article. Review.
-
In Vitro Activity of Ertapenem against Neisseria gonorrhoeae Clinical Isolates with Decreased Susceptibility or Resistance to Extended-Spectrum Cephalosporins in Nanjing, China (2013 to 2019).Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 May 17;66(5):e0010922. doi: 10.1128/aac.00109-22. Epub 2022 May 2. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022. PMID: 35491832 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of gastrointestinal side effects from different doses of azithromycin for the treatment of gonorrhoea.J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022 Jun 29;77(7):2011-2016. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkac118. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022. PMID: 35411400 Free PMC article.
-
Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Urogenital and Extragenital Neisseria gonorrhoeae Isolates Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: Strengthening the US Response to Resistant Gonorrhea and Enhanced Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project, 2018 to 2019.Sex Transm Dis. 2021 Dec 1;48(12S Suppl 2):S111-S117. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001548. Sex Transm Dis. 2021. PMID: 34475363 Free PMC article.
-
Update to CDC's Treatment Guidelines for Gonococcal Infection, 2020.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Dec 18;69(50):1911-1916. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6950a6. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020. PMID: 33332296 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical

